Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Mixed Medical Care Services in Japan ~ What is Equity? ~

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hiromi Saito

    (National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies)

  • Wataru Suzuki

    (Gakushuin University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The aim of this study is to examine the manner in which a Japanese medical regulation affects equity in health care within an economic framework. The regulation is termed “the ban on mixed treatment.” Mixed treatment is the mixed use of treatments covered by public health insurance as well as those not covered by such insurance in the course of treating an illness. In principle, the Japanese Health Ministry bans mixed treatment. In order to examine the effect of mixed treatment on equity in health care, we explain the background of Japanese mixed treatment. Thereafter, we introduce a simple economic model and provide suggestions regarding the behavior of patients under the ban rule. Based on the theoretical model, we simulate the behavior of patients using questionnaire data and analyze the results from various perspectives. Here, we create data using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The results suggest that lifting the ban could reduce differences in treatments among income/asset class but would make payment for health care regressive slightly. The results also suggest that the behavior of patients is different even within the same income/asset class, and there are other factors for receiving uninsured treatment besides capacity to pay.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.grips.ac.jp/r-center/wp-content/uploads/08-19_rev_web2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in its series GRIPS Discussion Papers with number 08-19.

    as in new window
    Length: 26 pages
    Date of creation: Mar 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:08-19

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 7-22-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 106-8677
    Phone: +81-(0)3-6439-6000
    Fax: +81-(0)3-6439-6010
    Web page: http://www.grips.ac.jp/r-center/en/discussion_papers/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Mixed treatments; Equity in access to health care; Freedom of choice in health care; Contingent Valuation Method.;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:08-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.