IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/40cb111baa964ce688821eb5ae999ced.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says (Executive Summary)

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Gill
  • Julie Bruch
  • Kevin Booker

Abstract

This report summarizes the evidence on measures of student achievement growth used in teacher evaluation that do not rely on traditional annual state assessments, and that instead use commercially available assessments, locally developed common assessments, and teacher-developed student learning objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Gill & Julie Bruch & Kevin Booker, 2013. "Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says (Executive Summary)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 40cb111baa964ce688821eb5a, Mathematica Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:40cb111baa964ce688821eb5ae999ced
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/midatlantic/pdf/REL_2013002_sum.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elias Walsh & Dallas Dotter & Albert Y. Liu, "undated". "Can More Teachers Be Covered? The Accuracy, Credibility, and Precision of Value-Added Estimates with Proxy Pre-Tests," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c61e6b4de71b4741b12bc978d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Moira McCullough & Brittany English & Megan Hague Angus & Brian Gill, "undated". "Alternative Student Growth Measures for Teacher Evaluation: Implementation Experiences of Early-Adopting Districts," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 8a9dfcb1bc6143608448114ea, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:40cb111baa964ce688821eb5ae999ced. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.