IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpg/wpaper/2017_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Abuse of Power – An experimental investigation of the effects of power and transparency on centralized punishment

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard Hoeft

    (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)

  • Wladislaw Mill

    (International Max Planck Research School on Adapting Behavior in a Fundamentally Uncertain World, School of Economics and Business Administration, Jena)

Abstract

We investigate power abuse of a single punisher in a public-goods-game subject to variations in punishment power and contribution transparency. We find a high amount of abuse across all conditions. More power led to more abuse over time, while transparency could only curb abuse in the high power conditions. These findings highlight the dangers of power centralization, but suggest a more complex relation of power and transparency

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard Hoeft & Wladislaw Mill, 2017. "Abuse of Power – An experimental investigation of the effects of power and transparency on centralized punishment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2017_15, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2017_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2017_15online.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonard Hoeft & Wladislaw Mill & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2019. "Normative Perception of Power Abuse," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2019_06, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    2. Kirchkamp, Oliver & Mill, Wladislaw, 2020. "Conditional cooperation and the effect of punishment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 150-172.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Punishment; Public-Goods-Game; Designated Punishment; Abuse; Transparency; Power;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2017_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marc Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.