Pauvreté et choix méthodologiques : le cas de la Mauritanie
AbstractThe measure of the poverty in Mauritania is considerably influenced by methodological choice. While a monetary poverty line of 370 dollars generates a ratio of poverty of households of 51,4 per cent, the cost of basis needs approach induces an impact of the national poverty of only 41,5per cent, and modifies appreciably the configuration ofpoverty profiles. Furthermore, if the introduction of a scale of equivalence whose value is inferior to one, does not modify really the extent the poverty - in terms of households as compared to the approach of the cost of basis needs -, it decreases relatively the impact and the depth of the urban poverty and, especially, tends to modify the relationship between the poverty and the gender. In addition, relatively to the international threshold of 370 dollars, thebasis needs approach suggests an appreciably highest decline of the poverty in the course of the period 1990 _ 96 : _34,9 per cent - against _19,8 - , result inferior to that that prevails when the line of poverty extreme is introduced - _40,4 per cent. Finally, objections formulated against the monetary poverty approach suggest a measure of the deficit of the social progress with the help of non monetary indicators. In this context, the human poverty indicator of UNDP shows, according to regions andwilayas, a proximity of the monetary poverty rate and the general degree of human poverty, although these two magnitudes are not really comparable and that many disparities subsist. In fact, the two indicators appear complementary, and each has a particular role in terms of economic policy. Consequently, the present study suggests the opportunity of a multidimensional approach of the poverty to order social states in Mauritania. (Full text in French)
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV in its series Documents de travail with number 22.
Length: 33 pages
Date of creation: Mar 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
- C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
- O55 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2000-01-31 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Jean-Luc Dubois & Isabelle Droy, 2001. "L'observatoire : un instrument pour le suivi de la pauvreté," Documents de travail 59, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
- Oumar Diop Diagne & Ousmane Faye & Salimata Faye, 2007. "Le noyau dur de la pauvreté au Sénégal," Working Papers PMMA 2007-17, PEP-PMMA.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.