Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Controverses autour de la courbe environnementale de Kuznets

Contents:

Author Info

  • André Meunié

    ()
    (GED, Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV)

Abstract

La multiplication des dégradations écologiques est à l'origine d'un renouvellement profond des débats sur les liens qu'entretiennent croissance et développement. Au début des années 1990, plusieurs études empiriques ont constaté l'existence d'une courbe en cloche entre divers indices de pollution et le niveau de revenu par tête. Ces auteurs lui attribuèrent le nom de « courbe environnementale de Kuznets » à cause de la similitude avec les résultats des travaux de ce dernier. Au-delà d'un certain niveau de richesse, la croissance économique s'accompagnerait d'une amélioration de l'état de l'environnement. Une stratégie économique soutenable consisterait alors à atteindre dans les meilleurs délais ce seuil pour ensuite continuer à s'enrichir « proprement ». Cependant, non seulement cette courbe n'est décelée que pour quelques polluants aux effets localisés, mais même dans ce cas, de nombreuses critiques méthodologiques fragilisent la portée de ces résultats. Il est donc abusif de vouloir en faire un fait stylisé du développement et d'autres voies de recherche doivent être explorées. The growing consciousness about environmental problem has renovated deeply the debate on the relations between economic growth and development. At the beginning of the 1990's, some empirical studies have brought to light the existence of an inverted U-shape relation between various environmental indicators and the level of income per capita. This phenomenon has been called the « environmental Kuznets curve » because of the similarity with the findings of this author about the links between social inequalities and per capita income. When a country is rich enough, the environmental damages begin to decline with income growth. So a sustainable strategy of development could be to reach this « turning point » as fast as possible. However, those results are extremely fragile. It seems that we can support the EKC hypothesis only for few pollutants with local impacts. But, even in this case, we will explain that a lot of methodology criticisms arise. In no way the EKC can be thought as a stylised fact of the development and other directions must be explore. (Full text in french)

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/ceddt107.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV in its series Documents de travail with number 107.

as in new window
Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: Nov 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:107

Contact details of provider:

Related research

Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Télé propagande : la terre vue du ciel de l’écologie
    by Jean Dubois in Tanstaafl-fr on 2007-07-06 11:46:00
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. André MEUNIE (GREThA) & Guillaume POUYANNE (GREThA), 2007. "Is there an Environmental Urban Kuznets Curve? The case of polluting emissions due to daily mobility in 37 cities. (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA 2007-04, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée.
  2. Jérôme Trotignon, 2012. "Les émissions de CO2 du Brésil - L'impact du secteur UTCATF (usage des terres, changement d'affectation des terres et foresterie)," Working Papers halshs-00746524, HAL.
  3. Jérôme Trotignon, 2012. "Les émissions de CO2 du Brésil- L’impact du secteur UTCATF (usage des terres, changement d’affectation des terres et foresterie)," Working Papers 1232, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique (GATE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Université Lyon 2, Ecole Normale Supérieure.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.