IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mcm/qseprr/440.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Where Would You Turn for Help? Older Adults’ Awareness of Community Health and Support Services for Dementia Care

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Denton
  • Jenny Ploeg
  • Joseph Tindale
  • Brian Hutchison
  • Kevin Brazil
  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh
  • Monica Quinlan
  • Jean Lillie
  • Jennifer Millen Plenderleith
  • Linda Boos

Abstract

Previous findings on older adults’ awareness of community support services (CSSs) have been inconsistent and marred by acquiescence or over-claiming bias. To address this issue, this study used a series of 12 vignettes to describe common situations faced by older adults for which CSSs might be appropriate. In telephone interviews, 1,152 adults aged 50 years and over were read a series of vignettes and asked if they were able to identify a community organization or agency that they may turn to in that situation. They were also asked about their most important sources of information about CSSs. The findings show that, using a vignette methodology, awareness of CSSs is much lower than previously thought. The most important sources of information about CSSs included information and referral sources, the telephone book, doctors’ offices, and word of mouth.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Denton & Jenny Ploeg & Joseph Tindale & Brian Hutchison & Kevin Brazil & Noori Akhtar-Danesh & Monica Quinlan & Jean Lillie & Jennifer Millen Plenderleith & Linda Boos, 2010. "Where Would You Turn for Help? Older Adults’ Awareness of Community Health and Support Services for Dementia Care," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 440, McMaster University.
    • Handle: RePEc:mcm:qseprr:440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/qsep/p/qsep440.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    aging; community support services; awareness; knowledge; acquiescence bias; vignette methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcm:qseprr:440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demcmca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.