We study the output costs of a reduction in monetary growth in a dynamic general equilibrium model with staggered wages. As in John Taylor's approach, the money wage is fixed for two periods, but in our model it is also chosen according to intertemporal optimisation as are consumption and money demand. Agents have labour market monopoly power. We show that the introduction of microfoundations helps to resolve the puzzle recently raised by Laurence Ball, namely that disinflation in staggered pricing models causes a boom. In our model disinflation, whether unanticipated or anticipated, unambiguously causes a slump.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
97-16.
Length: 32, 7 pages Date of creation: Dec 1997 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9716
Contact details of provider: Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark Phone: (+45) 35 32 26 26 Fax: +45 35 32 30 00 Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Henriette Aabo Hansen).
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)