IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2014-001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Political Selection Tournament and Environmental Policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Eiji SAWADA

    (Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering)

  • Xu Yirui

    (Kaetsu University Faculty of Management and Economics)

Abstract

As a means to give local governments a strong incentive for economic development, Chinese government has been used "political selection tournament." This control resulted in encouraging economic growth on one hand; it still remains some arguments about converting to green growth in China. We therefore examined that point by analytical approach using the framework of "elimination tournament model" proposed by Rosen (1986). We found that putting much weight on environmental improving as a promotion criterion does not always make local governments eager to address the improvement of natural environment. We also found that such a situation can be avoided by combining budget control with personnel control.

Suggested Citation

  • Eiji SAWADA & Xu Yirui, 2014. "Political Selection Tournament and Environmental Policy in China," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2014-001, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    • Handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2014-001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/pdf/en/DP2014-001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ke‐wei Cheng & Chen Feng & Yao Zhang, 2021. "Land price control and employee wages: A bunching analysis of factor cost transfer," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2477-2508, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Elimination tournament; personnel control; budget control; veto power; Green growth in China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2014-001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.