IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/202209221250360000.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Explains Science's Expanded Reliance On Postdoctoral Researchers?

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenbloom, Joshua

Abstract

Between 1979 and 2019 the number of postdoctoral researchers in the U.S. increased approximately four-fold, substantially outpacing growth in the numbers of graduate students and faculty at U.S. universities. This paper argues that the increased reliance on postdocs within the scientific workforce reflects the uncoordinated nature of science funding. While support for faculty and growth in their numbers largely reflects changes in undergraduate enrollments, the number of postdocs responds primarily to changes in the level of federal R&D funding. This argument is developed based on a review of aggregate data and past studies in combination with new evidence drawn from newly available data by discipline at the university level, which allows analysis of differences in reliance on post-docs across different fields of scholarship as well as the relationship of postdocs, faculty, funding and scientific productivity across institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenbloom, Joshua, 2022. "What Explains Science's Expanded Reliance On Postdoctoral Researchers?," ISU General Staff Papers 202209221250360000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202209221250360000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6789054e-194b-4409-aafd-15deb9afcd20/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua L Rosenbloom & Donna K Ginther & Ted Juhl & Joseph A Heppert, 2015. "The Effects of Research & Development Funding on Scientific Productivity: Academic Chemistry, 1990-2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Margaret E Blume-Kohout & John W Clack, 2013. "Are Graduate Students Rational? Evidence from the Market for Biomedical Scientists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graddy-Reed, Alexandra & Lanahan, Lauren & D'Agostino, Jesse, 2021. "Training across the academy: The impact of R&D funding on graduate students," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(5).
    2. Sujit Bhattacharya & Ravinder Kumar & Shubham Singh, 2020. "Capturing the salient aspects of IoT research: A Social Network Analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 361-384, October.
    3. Paula Stephan & Giuseppe Scellato & Chiara Franzoni, 2015. "International Competition for PhDs and Postdoctoral Scholars: What Does (and Does Not) Matter," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 73-113.
    4. David Popp, 2015. "Using Scientific Publications to Evaluate Government R&D Spending: The Case of Energy," NBER Working Papers 21415, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Blume-Kohout, Margaret E. & Adhikari, Dadhi, 2016. "Training the scientific workforce: Does funding mechanism matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1291-1303.
    6. Alona Zharova & Wolfgang K. Härdle & Stefan Lessmann, 2017. "Is Scientific Performance a Function of Funds?," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2017-028, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    7. Corinna Ghirelli & Enkelejda Havari & Elena Meroni & Stefano Verzillo, 2023. "The long-term causal effects of winning an ERC grant," Working Papers 2313, Banco de España.
    8. Kazuki Nakajima & Kazuyuki Shudo & Naoki Masuda, 2023. "Higher-order rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grant networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2429-2446, April.
    9. Conti, Annamaria & Visentin, Fabiana, 2015. "A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1931-1947.
    10. Hyungjo Hur & Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Joshua Hawley, 2015. "Effects of Government Spending on Research Workforce Development: Evidence from Biomedical Postdoctoral Researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Laura Sinay & Rodney William (Bill) Carter & Maria Cristina Fogliatti Sinay, 2020. "In the race for knowledge, is human capital the most essential element?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. David Popp, 2015. "Using Scientific Publications to Evaluate Government R&D Spending: The Case of Energy," CESifo Working Paper Series 5442, CESifo.
    13. Jarrín-V, Pablo & Falconí, Fander & Cango, Pedro & Ramos-Martin, Jesus, 2021. "Knowledge gaps in Latin America and the Caribbean and economic development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Olof Ejermo & John Källström, 2016. "What is the causal effect of R&D on patenting activity in a “professor’s privilege” country? Evidence from Sweden," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 677-694, October.
    15. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Brigida Blasi & Carmela Anna Nappi & Sandra Romagnosi, 2022. "Quality of research as source and signal: revisiting the valorization process beyond substitution vs complementarity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 407-434, April.
    16. Zharova, Alona & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Lessmann, Stefan, 2023. "Data-driven support for policy and decision-making in university research management: A case study from Germany," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 353-368.
    17. Davut Emrah Ayan & Laurel L. Haak & Donna K. Ginther, 2023. "How many people in the world do research and development?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 270-287, May.
    18. Sebastian Hoenen & Christos Kolympiris, 2020. "The Value of Insiders as Mentors: Evidence from the Effects of NSF Rotators on Early-Career Scientists," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 852-866, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202209221250360000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.