IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198201010800008508.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Projections of US farm numbers by Markov processes

Author

Listed:
  • Libbin, James D.

Abstract

The structure of agriculture for the remaining years of the twentieth century is an issue crucial to farmers and ranchers. Much interest has been focused in recent years on the structure of agriculture and specifically on the size distribution and number of farms and ranches. In recent studies, Markov chain processes have been applied to help predict the numbers and sizes of farms, and to analyze the movement of firms between size classes;Each of the previous attempts to apply the Markov process to the problem of estimating and projecting farm numbers has encountered some major difficulty in deriving a solution. Several of the model formulation and computational difficulties, such as the addition of a feasibility restriction, external constraints, cycling difficulties and computer algorithms, have been solved in the first two papers of this study;This study synthesized the results , problems and advances of previous reports to predict farm numbers by size class. Values of sales classes were chosen to represent size classes of farms, thus avoiding definitional questions of farms, ranches and nonland based farming operations;A series of USDA indexes were chosen for explanatory variables in the Markov regression problem. Approximately 30 combinations of nine different indexes were applied to the Markov model;Model results indicate that the historical decline in farm numbers will continue to a level of about two million farms by 1990. The farm number projections are closely tied to growth of remaining firms. The primary factors causing or allowing firms to grow in size include increases in the prices that farmers must pay for inputs and increased productivity of those inputs, especially their own labor;The results of this study indicate a continuing trend toward fewer, larger farms. Although much of the increase in size is caused by increases in prices received rather than real growth, there will be real growth as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Libbin, James D., 1982. "Projections of US farm numbers by Markov processes," ISU General Staff Papers 198201010800008508, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198201010800008508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/377dbb76-5b5d-40ad-aee3-19c98a35c6d8/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ching, C. T. K. & Davulis, J. P. & Frick, G. E., 1974. "An Evaluation Of Different Ways Of Projecting Farm Size Distributions," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Peter J. Barry & David R. Willmann, 1976. "A Risk-Programming Analysis of Forward Contracting with Credit Constraints," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(1), pages 62-70.
    3. Dent, Warren Thomas & Ballintine, Richard, 1971. "A Review Of The Estimation Of Transition Probabilities In Markov Chains," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Joyce T. Chen & C. B. Baker, 1974. "Marginal Risk Constraint Linear Program for Activity Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 56(3), pages 622-627.
    5. Boxley, Robert F., 1971. "Farm Size and the Distribution of Farm Numbers," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 23(4), pages 1-8, October.
    6. Jean-Marc Boussard & Michel Petit, 1967. "Representation of Farmers' Behavior under Uncertainty with a Focus-Loss Constraint," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 49(4), pages 869-880.
    7. Ching, C. T. K. & Davulis, J. P. & Frick, G. E., 1974. "An Evaluation Of Different Ways Of Projecting Farm Size Distributions," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, May.
    8. Warren Dent & Richard Ballintine, 1971. "A Review Of The Estimation Of Transition Probabilities In Markov Chains," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 69-81, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stavins, R. N. & Stanton, B. F., 1980. "Alternative Procedures For Estimating The Size Distribution Of Farms," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-6, October.
    2. Stavins, R. N. & Stanton, B. F., 1980. "Alternative Procedures For Estimating The Size Distribution Of Farms," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-6, October.
    3. Villacorta, Pablo J. & Verdegay, José L., 2016. "FuzzyStatProb: An R Package for the Estimation of Fuzzy Stationary Probabilities from a Sequence of Observations of an Unknown Markov Chain," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i08).
    4. van Zyl, J. & Groenewald, J. A., 1986. "A Comparison Of Certain Decision-Making Techniques Under Risk - An Empirical Investigation Of Maize Cultivar Selection," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 25(1), February.
    5. Anderson, Jock R., 1975. "Programming For Efficient Planning Against Non-Normal Risk," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Helmers, Glenn A. & Held, Larry J. & Watts, Myles J., 1982. "Estimating the Impact of Safety First Risk Constraints on Risk-Income Frontiers," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279474, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Walker, Odell L. & Hardin, Mike L. & Mapp, Harry P., Jr. & Roush, Clint E., 1979. "Farm Growth And Estate Transfer In An Uncertain Environment," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Libbin, James D. & Johnson, Donald A. & Boehlje, Michael D. & Trede, Larry D., 1977. "A Risk-Return Analysis For The Midwest Farmer-Feeder," ISU General Staff Papers 197712010800001065, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Eldosouky, AbdelRahman & Saad, Walid & Mandayam, Narayan, 2021. "Resilient critical infrastructure: Bayesian network analysis and contract-Based optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Helmers, Glenn A., 1979. "Deriving Risk-Income Relationships For Production-Marketing Decisions By Simulation," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271463, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    11. Smith, Matthew G., 1988. "A Conditional Approach To Projecting Farm Structure," Staff Reports 278025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. King, Robert P. & Robison, Lindon J., 1980. "Implementing Stochastic Dominance With Respect To A Function," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271563, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    13. Shonkwiler, J. Scott & Emerson, Robert D., 1981. "The Market for Winter Tomatoes: A Rational Expectations Interpretation," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279305, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Gempesaw, Conrado M., II & Tambe, A.M. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 1988. "The Single Index Market Model In Agriculture," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, October.
    15. Arie ten Cate, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the Markov chain model with macro data and the ecological inference model," CPB Discussion Paper 284, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Manus I. Midlarsky, 1982. "Scarcity and Inequality," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(1), pages 3-38, March.
    17. McCarl, Bruce A. & Musser, Wesley N., 1985. "Modeling Long Run Risk In Production And Investment Decisions," Regional Research Projects > 1985: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 24-27, 1985, Charleston, South Carolina 271799, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    18. Kögl, H., 1978. "Integrierte Finanz- und Investitionsplanung unter Unsicherheit," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 15.
    19. Musser, Wesley N. & Shurley, W. D. & Williams, F. W., 1980. "An E-V Analysis of Beef Calf Backgrounding Systems in Georgia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 37-42, December.
    20. Eddleman, Bobby R. & Moya-Rodriguez, J.E., 1979. "Influence Of Market Diversification On Farm Income Variability Of Soybean Producers," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198201010800008508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.