IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc101197.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

RIO Country Report 2015: Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Leopoldo Nascia

    (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (Rome, Italy))

  • Mario Pianta

    (Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo" (Urbino, Italy))

  • Giovanni La Placa

    (European Commission – JRC - IPTS)

Abstract

The 2015 series of RIO Country Reports analyse and assess the policy and the national research and innovation system developments in relation to national policy priorities and the EU policy agenda with special focus on ERA and Innovation Union. The executive summaries of these reports put forward the main challenges of the research and innovation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta & Giovanni La Placa, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Italy," JRC Research Reports JRC101197, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc101197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101197
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Pianta, 2014. "An industrial policy for Europe," Working Papers 1401, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2014.
    2. Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta, 2015. "RIO Country Report Italy 2014," JRC Research Reports JRC96575, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Claudia Cantabene & Leopoldo Nascia, 2014. "The race for R&D subsidies: evaluating the effectiveness of tax credits in Italy," ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 133-158.
    4. Emanuele Ciani & Vincenzo Mariani, 2014. "How the labour market evaluates Italian universities," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 247, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2017. "The intensity of business R&D in Italy: why reducing the gap with the EU is possible and worthwhile," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 245-257, June.
    2. Nascia, Leopoldo & Pianta, Mario, 2018. "Research and innovation policy in Italy," MPRA Paper 89510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lucchese, Matteo & Nascia, Leopoldo & Pianta, Mario, 2017. "Politica industriale e tecnologia in Italia [Industrial policy and technology in Italy]," MPRA Paper 77182, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta & Giovanni La Placa, 2018. "RIO Country Report 2017: Italy," JRC Research Reports JRC111327, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Matteo Lucchese & Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta, 2016. "Industrial policy and technology in Italy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 43(3), pages 233-260, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Lucchese & Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta, 2016. "Industrial policy and technology in Italy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 43(3), pages 233-260, September.
    2. Nascia, Leopoldo & Pianta, Mario, 2018. "Research and innovation policy in Italy," MPRA Paper 89510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lucchese, Matteo & Nascia, Leopoldo & Pianta, Mario, 2017. "Politica industriale e tecnologia in Italia [Industrial policy and technology in Italy]," MPRA Paper 77182, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    5. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Gianluca Capone & Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson & Luigi Orsenigo & Sidney G. Winter, 2019. "History friendly models: retrospective and future perspectives," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Roberta Capello & Silvia Cerisola, 2023. "Industrial transformations and regional inequalities in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 15-28, February.
    8. Alessio Terzi & Monika Sherwood & Aneil Singh, 2023. "European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 842-857.
    9. Castillo, Mario & Gligo, Nicolo & Rovira, Sebastián, 2017. "La política industrial 4.0 en América Latina," Documentos de Proyectos 43944, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Lucchese, Matteo & Pianta, Mario, 2020. "Europe’s alternative: a Green Industrial Policy for sustainability and convergence," MPRA Paper 98705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. David Aristei & Alessandro Sterlacchini & Francesco Venturini, 2017. "Effectiveness of R&D subsidies during the crisis: firm-level evidence across EU countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 554-573, August.
    12. Bulfone, Fabio, 2020. "The political economy of industrial policy in the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Laplane, Mariano Francisco & Laplane, Andrea, 2017. "Planes industriales y los desafíos del desarrollo sostenible en Brasil," Documentos de Proyectos 43932, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    14. Chiara Bocci & Annalisa Caloffi & Marco Mariani & Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2023. "Evaluating Public Support to the Investment Activities of Business Firms: A Multilevel Meta-Regression Analysis of Italian Studies," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, March.
    15. Cardinale, Roberto, 2019. "Theory and practice of State intervention: Italy, South Korea and stages of economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 206-216.
    16. Ilaria De Angelis & Vincenzo Mariani & Roberto Torrini, 2017. "New Evidence on Interregional Mobility of Students in Tertiary Education: The Case of Italy," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 73-96.
    17. Minaya, Veronica & Agasisti, Tommaso & Bratti, Massimiliano, 2022. "When need meets merit: The effect of increasing merit requirements in need-based student aid," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-06, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Giovanni Dosi, 2016. "Beyond the ‘magic of the market’. The slow return of industrial policy (but not yet in Italy)," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 43(3), pages 261-264, September.
    20. Lütkenhors, Wilfried, 2017. "La política industrial para el desarrollo sostenible," Documentos de Proyectos 43943, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    R&I system; R&I policy; ERA; innovation union; Semester analysis; Italy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc101197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.