IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipp/wpaper/1603.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Renta privada y capital de un ecosistema silvopastorial en el sistema central

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Mesa
  • Pablo Campos
  • Luis Díaz-Balteiro

Abstract

La ausencia de estudios de la renta y capital privadas de los usos múltiples de los ecosistemas silvopastorales en el Sistema Central dificulta conocer la realidad de la gestión que tiene lugar en las fincas privadas de esta zona de España. Por ello, el presente estudio ha analizado una explotación silvopastoral privada de la Sierra de Guadarrama en el año 2009. Aplicando el sistema de Cuentas Agroforestales, ha sido posible conocer el valor de la renta total privada y el capital privado de la explotación de unos valores, respectivamente, de 158,2 €/ha y 8.524,9 €/ha, y de cada uno de los usos múltiples privados existentes. Estos usos incluyen productos comerciales, como madera, pastos, ganado bovino o servicios residenciales, que representan en conjunto una renta total de 130,0 €/ha y un capital de 5.378,1 €/ha, así como la producción no comercial asociada al autoconsumo ambiental privado, que genera un valor de renta total de 28,2 €/ha y un capital de 3.146,8 €/ha. Con respecto a la madera, se han introducido como innovación a la metodología de Cuentas Agroforestales las reclasificaciones de capital, que permiten mejorar el cálculo de la ganancia de capital, alcanzando un valor de 11,7 €/ha para el pinar de la finca de estudio. La principal ventaja de la utilización del sistema de Cuentas Agroforestales es que contempla producciones ambientales que no son tenidas en cuenta por el sistema de Cuentas Económicas de la Agricultura y la Selvicultura de la Unión Europea. Este estudio, al aplicar la metodología de Cuentas Agroforestales, muestra la utilidad de esta herramienta para los gestores y propietarios de fincas privadas en el Sistema Central.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Mesa & Pablo Campos & Luis Díaz-Balteiro, 2016. "Renta privada y capital de un ecosistema silvopastorial en el sistema central," Working Papers 1603, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://investigacion.cchs.csic.es/RePEc/ipp/wpaper/csic-ipp-wp-2016-03_mesa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McElroy, Michael B, 1976. "Capital Gains and Social Income," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 14(2), pages 221-240, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campos, Pablo & Mesa, Bruno & Álvarez, Alejandro & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2022. "Towards measuring environmental income through a refined United Nations SEEA EA: Application to publicly-owned, protected, pine-forest-farm case studies in Andalusia, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & à lvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2019. "The role of non-commercial intermediate services in the valuations of ecosystem services: Application to cork oak farms in Andalusia, Spain," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    3. Paola Ovando & José L. Oviedo & Pablo Campos, 2015. "Measuring total social income of a stone pine afforestation in Huelva (Spain)," Working Papers 1501, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    4. Pablo Campos & José L. Oviedo & Alejandro Álvarez & Paola Ovando & Bruno Mesa & Alejandro Caparrós, 2019. "Agroforestry Accounting System Environmental Incomes Compared With Sna And Seea-Eea At Corporation Scale: Applications To Holm Oak Dehesas In Andalusia-Spain," Working Papers 1905, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    5. Campos, Pablo & Álvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Oviedo, José L. & Ovando, Paola & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2020. "Total income and ecosystem service sustainability index: Accounting applications to holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Álvarez, Alejandro & Ovando, Paola & Mesa, Bruno & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2020. "Measuring environmental incomes beyond standard national and ecosystem accounting frameworks: testing and comparing the agroforestry Accounting System in a holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Campos, Pablo & Caparrós, Alejandro & Oviedo, José L. & Ovando, Paola & Álvarez-Farizo, Begoña & Díaz-Balteiro, Luis & Carranza, Juan & Beguería, Santiago & Díaz, Mario & Herruzo, A. Casimiro & Martín, 2019. "Bridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 218-236.
    8. Campos, Pablo & Álvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2021. "Linking standard Economic Account for Forestry and ecosystem accounting: Total forest incomes and environmental assets in publicly-owned conifer farms in Andalusia-Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Ovando, Paola & Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2016. "Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 43-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adelheid Holl (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ippcses.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.