IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/idb/brikps/12463.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mitigating Coercive Parenting through Home Visitations: The Impacts of a Parenting Program Targeted at Vulnerable Communities in Jamaica

Author

Listed:
  • De Simone, Francesco
  • Mejia, Camila
  • Martinez-Carrasco, José
  • Perez-Vincent, Santiago M.
  • Villalba, Harold

Abstract

Family violence is a critical development challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), carrying high health, social, and economic costs and increasing the risk of perpetuating the cycle of violence across generations. Parenting programs have improved parenting practices in high-income countries. However, evidence for LMICs is sparse. This study evaluates an intervention to reduce coercive parenting implemented by the Ministry of National Security of Jamaica, which targeted caregivers of children aged 6 to 15 in vulnerable communities in the country. Treated caregivers were visited by a parental trainer for six months and invited to three sessions of a group training workshop during that period. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the interventions impact. Using data from a follow-up survey completed six months after the intervention, we find robust evidence of reduced coercive parenting practices among treated caregivers compared to the control group. The improvement is due to a reduction in the reported likelihood of caregivers yelling and beating their children for misbehaving. The effect is greater for caregivers with higher pre-intervention levels of coercive parenting. The results provide evidence that parenting interventions can effectively reduce coercive parenting among caregivers of school-aged children in highly violent middle-income settings.

Suggested Citation

  • De Simone, Francesco & Mejia, Camila & Martinez-Carrasco, José & Perez-Vincent, Santiago M. & Villalba, Harold, 2022. "Mitigating Coercive Parenting through Home Visitations: The Impacts of a Parenting Program Targeted at Vulnerable Communities in Jamaica," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12463, Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:idb:brikps:12463
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Mitigating-Coercive-Parenting-through-Home-Visitations-The-Impacts-of-a-Parenting-Program-Targeted-at-Vulnerable-Communities-in-Jamaica.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mairead Furlong & Sinead McGilloway & Tracey Bywater & Judy Hutchings & Susan M. Smith & Michael Donnelly, 2012. "Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural group‐based parenting programmes for early‐onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malin Ulfsdotter & Lene Lindberg & Anna Månsdotter, 2015. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Swedish Universal Parenting Program All Children in Focus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Axford, Nick & Bjornstad, Gretchen & Matthews, Justin & Heilmann, Sarah & Raja, Anam & Ukoumunne, Obioha C. & Berry, Vashti & Wilkinson, Tom & Timmons, Luke & Hobbs, Tim & Eames, Tim & Kallitsoglou, A, 2020. "The effectiveness of a therapeutic parenting program for children aged 6–11 years with behavioral or emotional difficulties: Results from a randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. McGuinness, Seamus & Bergin, Adele & Whelan, Adele, 2017. "Making centralised data work for community development: an exploration of area-based training programmes in a unified framework," Papers WP555, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Eve S Puffer & Jeannie Annan & Amanda L Sim & Carmel Salhi & Theresa S Betancourt, 2017. "The impact of a family skills training intervention among Burmese migrant families in Thailand: A randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Gibson, Matthew & Chesterman, Mark, 2022. "Collaborative skills development: Theory and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Furlong, Mairead & McLoughlin, Fergal & McGilloway, Sinead, 2021. "The incredible years parenting program for foster carers and biological parents of children in foster care: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Axford, Nick & Morpeth, Louise & Bjornstad, Gretchen & Hobbs, Tim & Berry, Vashti, 2022. "“What works” registries of interventions to improve child and youth psychosocial outcomes: A critical appraisal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Frances Gardner & UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, 2017. "Parenting Interventions: How well do they transport from one country to another?," Papers inores886, Innocenti Research Briefs.
    9. Houle, Andrée-Anne & Besnard, Thérèse & Bérubé, Annie, 2022. "Factors that influence parent recruitment into prevention programs in early childhood: A mixed studies systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    parenting; family violence; home visiting; randomized controlled trial; Jamaica; PAFAS; Alabama Parenting Questionnaire;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:brikps:12463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.