Although the importance of property rights as the engine of growth remains beyond dispute, this article tries to show that the crucial issue is not so much the definition of the allegedly ‘optimal’ property right system, as the understanding of the ideological elements that justify property rights in the first place – entrepreneurship and self-responsibility. Unless one clearly perceives the nature of the ideological structure that legitimises the rules of the game in a given society, it is virtually impossible to understand why growth-conducive property-right systems fail to emerge and be accepted. Put differently, property rights are certainly necessary for growth. But they are no tools for policy-making. Getting them right – or transferring them from other contexts - is not enough, especially if their assignment and enforcement remains a top-down process, whereby local politicians or international technocrats suggest and enforce institutional arrangements experienced elsewhere.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by ICER - International Centre for Economic Research in its series ICER Working Papers with number
23-2003.
Length: 27 pages Date of creation: Jun 2003 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:icr:wpicer:23-2003
Contact details of provider: Postal: Viale Settimio Severo, 63 - 10133 Torino - Italy Phone: +39 011 6604828 Fax: +39 011 6600082 Email: Web page: http://www.icer.it More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Alessandra Calosso).
Related research
Keywords:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: