IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iad/glliwa/210101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Living Wage Benchmark Report: Baja Carlifornia, Mexico (January 2021)

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo Delajara

    (Anker Research Institute)

  • Rocío Espinosa

    (Espinosa Yglesias Research Centre (CEEY))

  • Claudia Fonseca

    (Espinosa Yglesias Research Centre (CEEY))

  • Martha Anker

    (Anker Research Institute)

  • Richard Anker

    (Anker Research Institute)

Abstract

We present estimates of the living wage in the municipalities of Ensenada and San Quintín, which are located in the center and south of Baja California, México. Economic activity in these municipalities is concentrated in agriculture and fishing, and to a much lesser extent in industry. The poverty rates are considerably higher than average for Baja California, but somewhat lower than average for Mexico. In the calculation, we used the Anker and Anker (2017) methodology and data from both primary and secondary sources. We obtained food prices and housing costs directly through a price survey in the two areas studied. We inferred the costs of goods and services other than food and housing from secondary data sources. These secondary data sources, mainly household income and expenditure surveys, do not distinguish between municipalities, but do distinguish between urban and rural areas. The fact that Ensenada is predominantly urban and San Quintín rural and small towns, allowed us to obtain estimates of these costs for each municipality. We show that the living wage in the municipality of Ensenada is MXN 15,929 (US$ 800) per month, which consists of take-home pay of MXN 13,539 (US$ 680) and MXN 2,389 (US$ 120) in income tax and social security. For San Quintín, the living wage is MXN 15,009 (US$ 754) per month consisting of take-home pay of MXN 12,835 (US$ 645) with MXN 2,174 (US$ 109) in social security contribution and income tax. Although these values are similar with only a 5.5% difference between them, we recommend using the living wage that corresponds to each jurisdiction. However, for those companies that have workers in both municipalities and that consider it impractical to have, or cannot pay, two different living wages, we recommend using the higher estimate to ensure that the wage is sufficient to accommodate all workers in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo Delajara & Rocío Espinosa & Claudia Fonseca & Martha Anker & Richard Anker, 2021. "Living Wage Benchmark Report: Baja Carlifornia, Mexico (January 2021)," Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) 21-01-01, Universidad Privada Boliviana.
  • Handle: RePEc:iad:glliwa:210101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.globallivingwage.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Baja-Cali-LW-Benchmark.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesús David Aban Tamayo & Mariana Becerra Pérez & Marcelo Delajara & Lorenzo León Robles, 2020. "El Estándar de Ingreso Mínimo en cuatro grandes ciudades de México," Papers 2020_10, Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Living wage; Anker methodology; decent work; Baja California; Mexico.;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
      • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
      • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
      • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
      • J80 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - General

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iad:glliwa:210101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ricardo Nogales C. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciupbbo.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.