This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

On the General Existence of Pure Strategy Political Competition Equilibrium in Multi-dimensional Party-Faction Models

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Naoki Yoshihara
Abstract

In this paper, we consider political competition games of two parties in multi-dimensional policy spaces, where the two parties have two factions, opportunists and militants, that intra-party bargain with each other. In such a game, we adopt the party-unanimity Nash equilibrium (PUNE) [Roemer (1998; 1999; 2001)] as an appropriate solution concept, and examine the general existence problem of this. In particular, we suppose that any faction of each party does not necessarily have dictatorial power. We then provide a general existence theorem for PUNE in this class of games.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/Common/publication/DP/DP511.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University in its series Discussion Paper Series with number a511.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Nov 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hit:hituec:a511

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi City, Tokyo 186
Phone: +81-42-580-8327
Fax: +81-42-580-8333
Email:
Web page: http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Hiromichi Miyake).

Related research
Keywords: multi-dimensional political competition games; partyunanimity Nash equilibria; pure-compromise PUNE;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executive Compensation
M5 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Personnel Economics
J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Gomberg, Andrei, 2004. "Sorting equilibrium in a multi-jurisdiction model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 138-154, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Osborne, Martin J & Slivinski, Al, 1996. "A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 111(1), pages 65-96, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Kimiko Terai, 2006. "Parties with Policy Preferences and Uncertainty over Voter Behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 173-173, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Roemer, John E & Silvestre, Joaquim, 2002. " The "Flypaper Effect" Is Not an Anomaly," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Caplin, Andrew & Nalebuff, Barry, 1997. "Competition among Institutions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 306-342, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  6. John E. Roemer, 1999. "The Democratic Political Economy of Progressive Income Taxation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Other versions:
  7. Kimiko Terai, 2006. "Parties with Policy Preferences and Uncertainty Over Voter Behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 155-172, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Roemer, John E., 1998. "Why the poor do not expropriate the rich: an old argument in new garb," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 399-424, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Andrei Gomberg & Francisco Marhuenda & Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín, 2004. "A model of endogenous political party platforms," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 373-394, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. John E. Roemer, 2004. "Modeling Party Competition in General Elections," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1488, Cowles Foundation, Yale University. [Downloadable!]
  11. Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 1997. "An Economic Model of Representative Democracy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 112(1), pages 85-114, February.
    Other versions:
  12. John Roemer, 2005. "Will democracy engender equality?," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 217-234, 01. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Naoki Yoshihara, 2008. "A Theory of Political Competition over Military Policy and Income Redistribution," Discussion Paper Series a503, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University. [Downloadable!]
  14. John E. Roemer, 1997. "Political-economic equilibrium when parties represent constituents: The unidimensional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 479-502. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The yearly budget of IDEAS is exactly $0: it relies entirely on volunteer work.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.