IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-01566506.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'analyse économique du travail. Complémentarité ou parallélisme des propositions théoriques depuis les années 1880

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Rocca

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

Abstract

Une histoire longue de l'économie du travail permet d'identifier deux traditions d'analyse des questions du travail : l'approche qualifiée de "labor problems" et celle du "labor economics". Ce texte discute leurs conditions d'émergence, leurs fondements axiomatiques et leurs rapports dans le champ scientifique des dernières décennies. Au contraire de l'idée communément répandue, il est avancé l'idée que ces deux traditions peuvent être comprises comme deux "programmes de recherche" irréductibles.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Rocca, 2017. "L'analyse économique du travail. Complémentarité ou parallélisme des propositions théoriques depuis les années 1880," Working Papers halshs-01566506, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01566506
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01566506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01566506/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Institutional Economics: Then and Now," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 173-194, Summer.
    2. Pascal Ughetto, 2000. "Problématiques hétérodoxes du travail en économie : quel avenir," Post-Print halshs-00327617, HAL.
    3. Martin Segal, 1986. "Post-Institutionalism in Labor Economics: The Forties and Fifties Revisited," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 39(3), pages 388-403, April.
    4. Jean Cartelier, 2016. "L'intrus et l'absent, Essai sur le travail et le salariat dans la théorie économique," Post-Print hal-01411467, HAL.
    5. Daniel E. Gimble, 1991. "Institutionalist Labor Market Theory and the Veblenian Dichotomy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 625-648, September.
    6. Piore, Michael J, 1983. "Labor Market Segmentation: To What Paradigm Does It Belong?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 249-253, May.
    7. George R. Boyer & Robert S. Smith, 2001. "The Development of the Neoclassical Tradition in Labor Economics," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(2), pages 199-223, January.
    8. Ronnie J Phillips & Douglas Kinnear, 2004. "The Twentieth Century Trend Of Institutionalism In Mainstream Economics Journals," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Wisconsin "Government and Business" and the History of Heterodox Economic Thought, pages 283-300, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    9. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1998. "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 166-192, March.
    10. Barber, William J, 1987. "Should the American Economic Association Have Toasted Simon Newcomb at Its 100th Birthday Party?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 179-183, Summer.
    11. David Colander, 2018. "The Death Of Neoclassical Economics," Chapters, in: How Economics Should Be Done, chapter 5, pages 46-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Cyrille Ferraton, 2008. "Les valeurs guident et accompagnent notre recherche : l'institutionnalisme de Myrdal," Post-Print hal-03055290, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adem LEVENT, 2016. "Power, Market and Techno-Structure in John Kenneth Galbraith’s Thought," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 214-218, June.
    2. Duarte N. Leite & Sandra T. Silva & Oscar Afonso, 2014. "Institutions, Economics And The Development Quest," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 491-515, July.
    3. Elias Khalil, 1999. "Institutions, Naturalism and Evolution," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 61-81.
    4. Dimitrios Zikos, 2020. "Revisiting the Role of Institutions in Transformative Contexts: Institutional Change and Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Gonzalo Caballero, 2004. "Instituciones e historia económica: enfoques y teorías institucionales," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 6(10), pages 135-157, January-J.
    6. Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88, November.
    7. Onyeiwu, Steve & Jones, Robert, 2003. "An institutionalist perception of cooperative behavior," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 233-248, July.
    8. Vassil Tsanov & Iskra Beleva, 2014. "Is the labor market in Bulgaria segmented?," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 3-20,21-38.
    9. František Svoboda, 2007. "Za obzor neoklasické ekonomie: cesta k principům nové institucionální ekonomie [Beyond the horizon of neoclassical economics: navigation to principles of the new institutional economics]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(4), pages 539-557.
    10. Ricardo Kerguelén Méndez, 2016. "[Ensayo] Liberalismo e instituciones: Douglass North y la economía neoclásica," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 10(1), pages 249-290, June.
    11. Gagliardi, Francesca, 2008. "Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 416-443, February.
    12. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    13. Charles J. Whalen, 2020. "Post-Keynesian institutionalism: past, present, and future," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 71-92, January.
    14. Gonzalo Ordoñez & Alejandro Hernández & Carolina Hernández & Carolina Méndez, 2009. "Análisis bibliométrico de la Revista de Economía Institucional en sus primeros diez años," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 11(20), pages 309-353, January-J.
    15. Hüsnü BİLİR, 2018. "Commons ve Mitchell’in “İktisat” ve “Birey” Anlayışları," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(37).
    16. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    17. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    18. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Analiza otoczenia instytucjonalnego systemu tworzenia wiedzy w krajach Europy Środkowej [Analysis of the institutional environment of the knowledge subsystem in Central Europe]," MPRA Paper 95570, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    19. Olivier Favereau, 1989. "Marchés internes, marchés externes," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 273-328.
    20. Mengjie Tian & Mingyong Hong & Ji Wang, 2023. "Land resources, market-oriented reform and high-quality agricultural development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4165-4197, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pensée économique ; histoire ; économie du travail ; institutionnalisme ; analyse économique ; théorie économique;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01566506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.