IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-04060013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Deep Learning to Hedge Rainbow Options

Author

Listed:
  • Thibault Collin

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres)

Abstract

The general scope of this thesis will be to further study the application of artificial neural networks in the context of hedging rainbow options. Due to their inherently complex features, such as the correlated paths that the prices of their underlying assets take or their absence from traded markets, finding an optimal hedging strategy for rainbow options is difficult, and traders usually have to resort to models and methods they know are inaccurate. An alternative approach involving deep learning however recently surfaced in the context of hedging vanilla options [6], and researchers have started to see potential in the use of neural networks for options endowed with exotic features in [5], [12] and [22]. The key to a near-perfect hedge for contingent claims might be hidden behind the training of neural network algorithms [6], and the scope of this research will be to further investigate how those innovative hedging techniques can be extended to rainbow options [22], using recent research [21], and to compare our results with those proposed by the current models and techniques used by traders, such as running Monte-Carlo path simulations. In order to accomplish that, we will try to develop an algorithm capable of designing an innovative and optimal hedging strategy for rainbow options using some intuition developed to hedge vanilla options [21] and price exotics [5]. But although it was shown from past literature to be potentially efficient and cost-effective, the opaque nature of an artificial neural network will make it difficult for the deep learning algorithm to be fully trusted and used as a sole method for hedging purposes, but rather as an additional technique associated with other more reliable models.

Suggested Citation

  • Thibault Collin, 2023. "Using Deep Learning to Hedge Rainbow Options," Working Papers hal-04060013, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04060013
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04060013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04060013/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hutchinson, James M & Lo, Andrew W & Poggio, Tomaso, 1994. "A Nonparametric Approach to Pricing and Hedging Derivative Securities via Learning Networks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(3), pages 851-889, July.
    2. Vikranth Lokeshwar & Vikram Bhardawaj & Shashi Jain, 2019. "Neural network for pricing and universal static hedging of contingent claims," Papers 1911.11362, arXiv.org.
    3. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    4. Stulz, ReneM., 1982. "Options on the minimum or the maximum of two risky assets : Analysis and applications," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 161-185, July.
    5. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    6. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    7. Ryan Ferguson & Andrew Green, 2018. "Deeply Learning Derivatives," Papers 1809.02233, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    2. Ravi Kashyap, 2022. "Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1175-1215, August.
    3. Detlef Seese & Christof Weinhardt & Frank Schlottmann (ed.), 2008. "Handbook on Information Technology in Finance," International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-49487-4, November.
    4. Jaegi Jeon & Kyunghyun Park & Jeonggyu Huh, 2021. "Extensive networks would eliminate the demand for pricing formulas," Papers 2101.09064, arXiv.org.
    5. Antoine Jacquier & Emma R. Malone & Mugad Oumgari, 2019. "Stacked Monte Carlo for option pricing," Papers 1903.10795, arXiv.org.
    6. Yongxin Yang & Yu Zheng & Timothy M. Hospedales, 2016. "Gated Neural Networks for Option Pricing: Rationality by Design," Papers 1609.07472, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    7. Lars Stentoft, 2008. "Option Pricing using Realized Volatility," CREATES Research Papers 2008-13, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    8. Kenji Hamatani & Masao Fukushima, 2011. "Pricing American options with uncertain volatility through stochastic linear complementarity models," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 263-286, October.
    9. Weiping Li & Su Chen, 2018. "The Early Exercise Premium In American Options By Using Nonparametric Regressions," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Capuozzo, Pietro & Panella, Emanuele & Schettini Gherardini, Tancredi & Vvedensky, Dimitri D., 2021. "Path integral Monte Carlo method for option pricing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    11. Hsuan-Chu Lin & Ren-Raw Chen & Oded Palmon, 2016. "Explaining the volatility smile: non-parametric versus parametric option models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 907-935, May.
    12. Stentoft, Lars, 2011. "American option pricing with discrete and continuous time models: An empirical comparison," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 880-902.
    13. Katarzyna Toporek, 2012. "Simple is better. Empirical comparison of American option valuation methods," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 29.
    14. Kristensen, Dennis & Mele, Antonio, 2011. "Adding and subtracting Black-Scholes: A new approach to approximating derivative prices in continuous-time models," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 390-415.
    15. Bodo Herzog & Sufyan Osamah, 2019. "Reverse Engineering of Option Pricing: An AI Application," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Johannes Ruf & Weiguan Wang, 2019. "Neural networks for option pricing and hedging: a literature review," Papers 1911.05620, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    17. Christian Bayer & Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Benjamin Stemper & Mehdi Tomas, 2019. "On deep calibration of (rough) stochastic volatility models," Papers 1908.08806, arXiv.org.
    18. Mark Broadie & Jérôme Detemple, 1996. "Recent Advances in Numerical Methods for Pricing Derivative Securities," CIRANO Working Papers 96s-17, CIRANO.
    19. Cao, Yi & Liu, Xiaoquan & Zhai, Jia, 2021. "Option valuation under no-arbitrage constraints with neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 361-374.
    20. Li, Hongshan & Huang, Zhongyi, 2020. "An iterative splitting method for pricing European options under the Heston model☆," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quantitative finance; deep hedging; deep learning; machine learning; rainbow options; call options; call worst-of options; black scholes; geometric brownian motion;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04060013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.