IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03919186.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bi-revealed utilities in a defaultable universe : a new point of view on consumption

Author

Listed:
  • El Karoui

    (LPSM (UMR_8001) - Laboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation - SU - Sorbonne Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité)

  • Mrad Mohamed

    (LAGA - Laboratoire Analyse, Géométrie et Applications - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

  • Caroline Hillairet

    (ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique)

Abstract

This paper investigates the inverse problem of bi-revealed utilities in a defaultable universe, defined as a standard universe (represented by a filtration $\bF$) perturbed by an exogenous defaultable time $\tau$. We assume that the standard universe does not take into account the possibility of the default, thus $\tau$ adds an additional source of risk. The defaultable universe is represented by the filtration $\bG$ {\it up to time $\tau$}, where $\bG$ stands for the progressive enlargement of $\bF$ by $\tau$. The basic assumption in force is that $\tau$ avoids $\bF$-stopping times. The bi-revealed problem consists in recovering a consistent dynamic utility from the observable characteristic of an agent. The general results on bi-revealed utilities, first given in a general and abstract framework, are translated in the defaultable $\bG$-universe and then are interpreted in the $\bF$-universe. The decomposition of $\bG$-adapted processes provides an interpretation of a $\bG$-characteristic $X^\bG_\tau$ stopped at $\tau$ as a reserve process. Thanks to the characterization of $\bG$-martingales stopped at $\tau$ in terms of $\bF$-martingales, we establish a correspondence between $\bG$-bi-revealed utilities from characteristic and $\bF$-bi-revealed pair of utilities from characteristic and reserves. In a financial framework, characteristic can be interpreted as wealth and reserves as consumption. This result sheds a new light on the consumption in utility criterion: the consumption process can be interpreted as a certain quantity of wealth, or reserves, that are accumulated for the financing of losses at the default time.

Suggested Citation

  • El Karoui & Mrad Mohamed & Caroline Hillairet, 2022. "Bi-revealed utilities in a defaultable universe : a new point of view on consumption," Working Papers hal-03919186, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03919186
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03919186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03919186/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El Karoui, Nicole & Jeanblanc, Monique & Jiao, Ying, 2010. "What happens after a default: The conditional density approach," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 1011-1032, July.
    2. Chambers,Christopher P. & Echenique,Federico, 2016. "Revealed Preference Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107087804.
    3. Tahir Choulli & Catherine Daveloose & Michèle Vanmaele, 2020. "A martingale representation theorem and valuation of defaultable securities," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1527-1564, October.
    4. M. Musiela & T. Zariphopoulou, 2009. "Portfolio choice under dynamic investment performance criteria," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 161-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cherchye, Laurens & Demuynck, Thomas & De Rock, Bram, 2018. "Transitivity of preferences: when does it matter?," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), September.
    2. Pawel Dziewulski, 2016. "Eliciting the just-noticeable difference," Economics Series Working Papers 798, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Wenyuan Wang & Kaixin Yan & Xiang Yu, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio with Ratio Type Periodic Evaluation under Short-Selling Prohibition," Papers 2311.12517, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    4. Federico Echenique & SangMok Lee & Matthew Shum & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2021. "Stability and Median Rationalizability for Aggregate Matchings," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2021. "Choice resolutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 713-753, May.
    6. Fontana, Claudio & Grbac, Zorana & Jeanblanc, Monique & Li, Qinghua, 2014. "Information, no-arbitrage and completeness for asset price models with a change point," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(9), pages 3009-3030.
    7. Federico Echenique & Taisuke Imai & Kota Saito, 2018. "Approximate Expected Utility Rationalization," CESifo Working Paper Series 7348, CESifo.
    8. Nicole El Karoui & Monique Jeanblanc & Ying Jiao, 2013. "Density approach in modelling multi-defaults," Working Papers hal-00870492, HAL.
    9. Lijun Bo & Ying Jiao & Xuewei Yang, 2011. "Credit derivatives pricing with default density term structure modelled by L\'evy random fields," Papers 1112.2952, arXiv.org.
    10. Stephane Goutte & Armand Ngoupeyou, 2012. "Optimization problem and mean variance hedging on defaultable claims," Papers 1209.5953, arXiv.org.
    11. Ying Jiao & Yahia Salhi & Shihua Wang, 2022. "Dynamic Bivariate Mortality Modelling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 917-938, June.
    12. Tahir Choulli & Sina Yansori, 2022. "Log-optimal and numéraire portfolios for market models stopped at a random time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 535-585, July.
    13. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Yaqin Liu & Martin Smith & Frank Asche, 2019. "Non-Parametric Tests of the Tragedy of the Commons," NBER Working Papers 26398, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Miguel A. Costa‐Gomes & Carlos Cueva & Georgios Gerasimou & Matúš Tejiščák, 2022. "Choice, deferral, and consistency," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1297-1318, July.
    15. Ying Hu & Gechun Liang & Shanjian Tang, 2018. "Systems of ergodic BSDEs arising in regime switching forward performance processes," Papers 1807.01816, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    16. Chong, Wing Fung, 2019. "Pricing and hedging equity-linked life insurance contracts beyond the classical paradigm: The principle of equivalent forward preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 93-107.
    17. Paolo Tella, 2022. "On the Propagation of the Weak Representation Property in Independently Enlarged Filtrations: The General Case," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 2194-2216, December.
    18. Chambers, Christopher P. & Rehbeck, John, 2018. "Note on symmetric utility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-29.
    19. Safa Alsheyab & Tahir Choulli, 2021. "Reflected backward stochastic differential equations under stopping with an arbitrary random time," Papers 2107.11896, arXiv.org.
    20. Claudio Fontana & Thorsten Schmidt, 2016. "General dynamic term structures under default risk," Papers 1603.03198, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03919186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.