IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01543416.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Complex polysemy and reflexivity in organizational research

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Harbour

    (UQO - Université du Québec en Outaouais)

  • Jacques-Bernard Gauthier

    (UQO - Université du Québec en Outaouais)

Abstract

Although it raises some interest in the field of social sciences, polysemy is often overlooked in organizational science, where research relies on positivist traditions. These traditions continue to influence researchers, regardless of their epistemological or methodological approaches; this in turn has an impact on the way they address polysemic terms. Our objective is to propose an integrative reflexive approach structured around eight topics of reflexion in order to explore how, in an organizational research project, both participants and researchers understand and use complex polysemic terms. By doing so, we bring four major contributions: it first highlights the central position polysemy could occupy in organizational science; secondly, polysemy could bridge and enhance the debate between positivist and interpretivist organizational researchers; thirdly, reflexivity for polysemy has the potential to improve the theorization; and finally, the mutual influence between polysemy and reflexivity could stimulate creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Harbour & Jacques-Bernard Gauthier, 2020. "Complex polysemy and reflexivity in organizational research," Working Papers hal-01543416, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01543416
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01543416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01543416/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard L. Daft & Arie Y. Lewin, 1990. "Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Michelle Harbour & Veronika Kisfalvi, 2014. "In the Eye of the Beholder: An Exploration of Managerial Courage," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(4), pages 493-515, February.
    3. Nancy Staudenmayer & Marcie Tyre & Leslie Perlow, 2002. "Time to Change: Temporal Shifts as Enablers of Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 583-597, October.
    4. Mats Alvesson & Cynthia Hardy & Bill Harley, 2008. "Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 480-501, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin J. Dooley & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1999. "Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 358-372, June.
    2. Robert, Kihlberg & Ola, Lindberg, 2021. "Reflexive sensegiving: An open-ended process of influencing the sensemaking of others during organizational change," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 476-486.
    3. Dvora Yanow & Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "What is Reflection‐In‐Action? A Phenomenological Account," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1339-1364, December.
    4. Garry D. Bruton & Vance H. Fried & Robert D. Hisrich, 2000. "CEO Dismissal in Venture Capital-Backed Firms: Further Evidence from an Agency Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 69-77, July.
    5. Chen, Victor Zitian & Cantwell, John, 2019. "Resistant roots of institutional diversity across societies: An evolutionary framework," SocArXiv 3gaqj, Center for Open Science.
    6. Stephen Allen & Ann L. Cunliffe & Mark Easterby-Smith, 2019. "Understanding Sustainability Through the Lens of Ecocentric Radical-Reflexivity: Implications for Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 781-795, February.
    7. Claudia Bird Schoonhoven & Alan D. Meyer & James P. Walsh, 2005. "Moving Beyond the Frontiers of Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 453-455, October.
    8. Fabrice L. Cavarretta & Sean T Hannah & Ronald F Piccolo & Mary Uhl-Bien, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," Working Papers hal-01214027, HAL.
    9. Perfetto, Maria Concetta & Vargas-Sánchez, Alfonso & Presenza, Angelo, 2016. "Managing A Complex Adaptive Ecosystem: Towards A Smart Management Of Industrial Heritage Tourism," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 4(3), pages 243-264.
    10. Elisa Giuliani & Annamaria Tuan & José Calvimontes Cano, 2021. "Creating Shared Value Meets Human Rights: A Sense-Making Perspective in Small-Scale Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 489-505, October.
    11. Monika BOGUSZEWICZ-KREFT & Jan KREFT, 2016. "Metaforyczny Opis Organizacji W Zarządzaniu I Marketingu Przedsiębiorstw Usługowych," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 27-36.
    12. Andrew P. Knight, 2015. "Mood at the Midpoint: Affect and Change in Exploratory Search Over Time in Teams That Face a Deadline," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 99-118, February.
    13. Jennifer A. Chatman & Francis J. Flynn, 2005. "Full-Cycle Micro-Organizational Behavior Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 434-447, August.
    14. Roth, Steffen, 2021. "The great reset of management and organization theory. A European perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 538-544.
    15. Gideon D. Markman & Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2008. "Research and Technology Commercialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1401-1423, December.
    16. Alberto Ferraris & Gabriele Santoro & Anna Claudia Pellicelli, 2020. "“Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1259-1280, December.
    17. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    18. Howard, Matt C. & Reiley, Peter J., 2020. "Physical courage predicts relevant outcomes in associated contexts: The creation of a measure and empirical analysis into the construct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 80-94.
    19. Arie Y. Lewin & Henk W. Volberda, 1999. "Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 519-534, October.
    20. Vivien Blanchet & Véronique Magista & Véronique Perret, 2013. "Stop filling in the gaps! Rethinking organizational justice through problematization," Post-Print halshs-00844204, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research methods; polysemy; reflexivity; theorization; creativity;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01543416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.