IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01507057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizing precarious spaces: An Actor- Network approach on Favelas

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Kaiser Fernandes

    (Estética, História, Memória e as Práticas Cotidianas nas Organizações -)

  • Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga

    (Estética, História, Memória e as Práticas Cotidianas nas Organizações -)

Abstract

For a considerable time the debate on space in the field of Management of Organization studies (MOS) has not had a central role (Gagliardi, 1996; Yanow, 1998; Kornberger; Clegg, 2004; Hernes, 2004; Dale; Burrel, 2008). The intention of the so-called "spatial turn" movement is to revisit the issue of spaces and materiality in the social sciences (Lefebvre, 1994; Soja, 1989; 1996; Massey, 1994), and how they are reflected in organization studies (Van Marrewijk; Yanow, 2010; Clegg; Kornberger, 2006; Dale; Burrell, 2008). Therefore, different lines of research found themselves committed to addressing the issue of organizational spaces – more specifically, in process epistemology and sociomateriality. Following this line of reasoning, the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) approach provides a theoretical and methodological strategy to the study on how the relations between human and non-human actors are intertwined on networks, and what their effects are in terms of organization. Initially, ANT studies were focused on the production of knowledge within science and technology laboratories, and were based on ethnographic studies (Latour; Woolgar, 1979; Knorr-Cetina, 1981; Sismondo, 2004). It has evolved, however, into a study tool in different fields of knowledge. As such, urban assemblages (Farías, 2011) may be considered an attempt to introduce ANT to the study of urban spaces. By acknowledging capitalism as an urban revolution set upon the expansion of urban spaces, Lefebvre's position contributed to the debate over this epistemological turning point (Farías, 2011). The way, then, the city is viewed leads to multiple ways of living in, and building, urban spaces. These ways aspire to become "laboratories" that allow or limit the sphere of activity in which designers, users, planners, people, conflicting needs and ideas are interpreted or developed (Czarniwaska, Löfgren, 2012). Creative urban spaces are not merely designer projections. Sociologists and architects speak of "projective cities" (Boltanski; Chiapello, 2005; Lee; Jacoby, 2011), and although the former focus on urban projections (Lundin; Söderholm, 1998), and the latter on cityscapes, both are closely connected. This gives rise to the idea that anthropologists conceive cities as networks (De Landa, 1994), in which a poor, anarchic selfmanagement coexists with its structures and hierarchies. We looked at a specific favela, or Brazilian slum, as a black box – a generalized impression of that favela as a phenomenon detached from the remainder of society – in an attempt to understand its precarious spaces. The attempt also included questioning the assumptions about precarity, and an organization here is taken as "a seemingly stable entity from the outside, obscuring the precarious social relations that hold it together inside" (Latour, 1987). In using the term, we will also attempt to indicate that "a network's capacity to sustain an extreme alignment of its actors is precarious; networks are said to oscillate between a status of ‘actor' and ‘network'." (Durepos & Mills, 2011). According to Mol & Law (1994), ANT provides an outlook on the concept of space that discusses many issues connected to multiple topologies, including: (i) regions, as an identifiable, homogeneous set assigned to specific limits or defined territories; (ii) networks, which create regions, are composed of immutable movables when connecting elements; and (iii) fluids – spaces in which the boundaries of places are unclear and based on unstable connections. Space, then, behaves as a "liquid continuity", and entities may be similar and dissimilar at different locations (Mol & Law, 1994). Under a different perspective, it is possible to see that the inequality parameters in peripheral urban areas, such as in Brazilian cities, can be measured from specific data: 80% of the Brazilian population, i.e., about 170 million people, live in the city, whereas 34.4% live in poor housing areas, such as places lacking sanitation coverage and/or land ownership (Abreu, 2008). In 2016, which marks the city of Fortaleza's – the capital of the state of Ceará – 290 years of existence, an urban sprawl scenario is translated into social inequalities that denounce the interests and projects which are stoked by the way its land is used and occupied. According to "State of the World Cities", a recent (2012-2013) report published by the UN, the Ceará capital is among the five most unequal cities in the world: 7% of its wealthier neighborhoods retain 26% of the total personal income, i.e., of all the wealth produced in the city. Only a few studies have used the Actor-Network Theory to discuss the issue of space, and only with management and organization approaches – in the context of Brazilian favelas, it remains unexplored. Considering this gap in the literature, this research will study primarily the MISMEC-4 Varas organization (4 Varas Community's Integrated Movement for Mental Health) and the adjacent urban areas on which it acts. The purpose, therefore, is to describe the actor networks that are active in MISMEC and its adjacent urban spaces, and to discuss the effects this organization has on the suburban neighborhood of Pirambu, located in the city of Fortaleza, the capital of the Brazilian state of Ceará.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Kaiser Fernandes & Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga, 2016. "Organizing precarious spaces: An Actor- Network approach on Favelas," Post-Print halshs-01507057, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01507057
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01507057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01507057/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev, 2013. "Materiality and space: organizations, artefacts and practices," Post-Print hal-01648118, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12853 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jean-François Chanlat, 2006. "Space, organization and management : a socio-historical perspective," Post-Print hal-00161543, HAL.
    4. Czarniawska, Barbara, 2004. "On Time, Space, and Action Nets," GRI-rapport 2004:5, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Sytze Kingma, 2018. "Proceedings of the 8th Organizations, Artifacts and Practices Workshop, New Ways of Working (NWW): Rematerializing Organizations in the Digital Age. 20nd - 22th June 2018 Amsterdam," Post-Print halshs-01818149, HAL.
    2. Anne Kokkonen & Pauli Alin, 2015. "Practice-based learning in construction projects: a literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 513-530, July.
    3. Johnson, Hannes & Styhre, Linda, 2015. "Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 167-178.
    4. Middleton, Stuart & Liesch, Peter W. & Steen, John, 2011. "Organizing time: Internationalization narratives of executive managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 136-150, April.
    5. Lambert Jerman & Julien Raone, 2014. "Dompter La Verite Dans L'Organisation : La Subjectivation Comme Production De L'Animal Confessant," Post-Print hal-01899765, HAL.
    6. Cecilia Cassinger & Henrik Merkelsen & Jörgen Eksell & Rasmus Kjærgaard Rasmussen, 2016. "Translating public diplomacy and nation branding in Scandinavia: An institutional approach to the cartoon crises," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 172-186, August.
    7. Flávia Naves & Yuna Fontoura, 2022. "Feminist resistance building in the Brazilian agroecology movement: A gender decoloniality study," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 408-426, March.
    8. Lindberg, Kajsa, 2014. "Performing multiple logics in practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 485-497.
    9. Lei Peng & Ruiying Jia, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay of the Physical Environment and Organizational Climate in Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Caroline A. Bartel & Raghu Garud, 2009. "The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 107-117, February.
    11. Fenna Blomsma & Mike Tennant & Ritsuko Ozaki, 2023. "Making sense of circular economy: Understanding the progression from idea to action," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1059-1084, March.
    12. Barbara Czarniawska, 2011. "Anthropology and the organisation theory. Yesterday and today (Antropologia i teoria organizacji. Wczoraj i dzis)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(32), pages 11-29.
    13. Jintong Tang & Zhi Tang & Jerome A. Katz, 2014. "Proactiveness, Stakeholder–Firm Power Difference, and Product Safety and Quality of Chinese SMEs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(5), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Robin Williams & Neil Pollock, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-22, March.
    15. David Pauleen & John Campbell & Brian Harmer & Ali Intezari, 2015. "Making Sense of Mobile Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    16. Américo, Bruno Luiz & Carniel, Fagner & Clegg, Stewart Roger, 2019. "Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 18-28.
    17. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, 2021. "Do coworking spaces promise a revolution or spark revenge? A Foucauldian spatio-material approach to the re-spatialization of remote work in coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03330208, HAL.
    18. François-Xavier de Vaujany & R. Robin Holt & Albane Grandazzi, 2023. "Conclusion: time and political organizing: five avenues for further research on the way to power and emancipation," Post-Print hal-04220271, HAL.
    19. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev, 2015. "The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell?," Post-Print hal-01215546, HAL.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13554 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Brian T. Pentland & Martha S. Feldman, 2007. "Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 781-795, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Études organisationnelles;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01507057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.