IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01919122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A conceptual framework to identify key drivers for logistics and transport demand - testing the scheme for goods movement in the pharmaceutical supply chain in France and Germany
[Un cadre conceptuel pour identifier les principaux déterminants de la demande logistique et de transport - application à la logistique pharmaceutique en France et en Allemagne]

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Blanquart

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Saskia Seidel

    (DLR - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt [Berlin])

  • Ina Frenzel

    (DLR - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt [Berlin])

Abstract

Geographical analyses regarding retail mainly stress business concentration and formations of supply chains. Hereby, main works focused on spatial re-organizations [e.g. 1]. The development of transport and factors that attract transport are rarely or even not considered. But, particularly with an eye on forecasts of increasing commercial transport, the aspect of transport influencing factors becomes more important. The authors developed a conceptual framework for analysing retailer's logistics and transport organization and its relationship to external factors. In this framework, factors that affect retailing companies are classified to different categories which are organized on three different levels: micro-, meso-, and macro-level. In this article the conceptual framework is implemented for the pharmaceutical sector in France and Germany. The authors' main assumption is that retailers' logistics and transport organization in the pharmaceutical sector in both countries are dependent to non-transport-related context. It is defined by a strictly regulated macro structure where prices, distribution, service obligations, pharmacy ownership, stocking etc. are ruled by government guidelines. As a consequence the identified indicators for logistics and transport demand are at a certain level shaped by these circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Blanquart & Saskia Seidel & Ina Frenzel, 2018. "A conceptual framework to identify key drivers for logistics and transport demand - testing the scheme for goods movement in the pharmaceutical supply chain in France and Germany [Un cadre conceptu," Post-Print hal-01919122, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01919122
    DOI: 10.25578/RTS_ISSN1951-6614_2018-07
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01919122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01919122/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25578/RTS_ISSN1951-6614_2018-07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Grandfils, 2008. "Drug price setting and regulation in France," Working Papers DT16, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Sep 2008.
    2. Zoltán Kaló & Elizabeth Docteur & Pierre Moïse, 2008. "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Slovakia," OECD Health Working Papers 31, OECD Publishing.
    3. Corinne Blanquart & Saskia Seidel & Barbara Lenz, 2014. "A conceptual framework to understand retailers'logistics and transport organization-illustrated for groceries'goods movements in France and Germany," Post-Print hal-00985969, HAL.
    4. Valérie Paris & Elizabeth Docteur, 2008. "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Germany," OECD Health Working Papers 39, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina Elisabeth Fischer & Taika Koch & Karel Kostev & Tom Stargardt, 2018. "The impact of physician-level drug budgets on prescribing behavior," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(2), pages 213-222, March.
    2. Geng, Difei & Saggi, Kamal, 2020. "Optimal price regulations in international pharmaceutical markets with generic competition," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Begoña Garcia Mariñoso & Izabela Jelovac & Pau Olivella, 2011. "External referencing and pharmaceutical price negotiation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 737-756, June.
    4. Kanavos, Panos, 2019. "Does external reference pricing deliver what it promises? Evidence on its impact at national level," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101522, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Lianne Barnieh & Fiona Clement & Anthony Harris & Marja Blom & Cam Donaldson & Scott Klarenbach & Don Husereau & Diane Lorenzetti & Braden Manns, 2014. "A Systematic Review of Cost-Sharing Strategies Used within Publicly-Funded Drug Plans in Member Countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Mathias Kifmann & Sven Neelsen, 2010. "Germany's Struggle with Prices for Patent-protected Drugs," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(03), pages 43-52, October.
    7. Thierry Debrand & Christine Sorasith, 2010. "Out-of-Pocket Maximum Rules under a Compulsatory Health Care Insurance Scheme: A Choice between Equality and Equity," Working Papers DT34, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Nov 2010.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5987 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Fontrier, Anna-Maria & Gill, Jennifer & Kanavos, Panos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy makers care?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100929, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Thierry Debrand & Nicolas Sirven, 2009. "What are the Motivations of Pathways to Retirement in Europe: Individual, Familial, Professional Situation or Social Protection Systems?," Working Papers DT28, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Oct 2009.
    11. Anna-Maria Fontrier & Jennifer Gill & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy-makers care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(8), pages 1147-1164, November.
    12. repec:ces:ifodic:v:8:y:2010:i:3:p:14566949 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Gorecki, Paul K. & Nolan, Anne & Brick, Aoife & Lyons, Seán, 2012. "Pharmaceuticals Delivery in Ireland. Getting a Bigger Bang for the Buck," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS24, June.
    14. Jennifer Gill & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Dionysis Kyriopoulos & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1375-1397, December.
    15. Panos Kanavos & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Jennifer Gill & Olina Efthymiadou, 2020. "Does external reference pricing deliver what it promises? Evidence on its impact at national level," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 129-151, February.
    16. Hossein, Zare & Gerard, Anderson, 2013. "Trends in cost sharing among selected high income countries—2000–2010," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 35-44.
    17. Or, Zeynep & Cases, Chantal & Lisac, Melanie & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Winblad, Ulrika & Bevan, Gwyn, 2010. "Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 269-293, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    logistics and transport; pharmaceutical retail; pharmaceutical sector; fret; pharmacies; secteur pharmaceutique; logistique; transport;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01919122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.