IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01837517.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing an argumentative decision-aiding tool for urban planning. AIPA : an interface between multicriteria decision aiding and argumentative frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Delhomme

    (I2M - Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UB - Université de Bordeaux - ENSAM - École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Franck Taillandier

    (I2M - Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UB - Université de Bordeaux - ENSAM - École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Irène Abi-Zeid

    (ULaval - Université Laval [Québec])

  • Rallou Thomopoulos

    (UMR IATE - Ingénierie des Agro-polymères et Technologies Émergentes - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - UM - Université de Montpellier - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge - LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique)

  • Cédric Baudrit

    (I2M - Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UB - Université de Bordeaux - ENSAM - École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Laurent Mora

    (I2M - Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UB - Université de Bordeaux - ENSAM - École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Urban planning is an important issue for all cities. In order to meet the challenges of sustainable urban planning, we propose a participative decision-support tool that allows stakeholders to engage jointly in structuring a decision process, to identify alternatives, to construct criteria, to challenge their relevance and to evaluate them. The novelty in our approach is the use of an argumentative approach to support multicriteria decision aiding. The use of an argumentative framework allows the stakeholders to formalize the decision problem by taking explicitly into account the diverse opinions expressed and ensuring their traceability. Through the argumentative approach, our goal is thus to enhance participatory decision making by organizing and formalizing debates between stakeholders. To this effect, we propose AIPA, an interface the makes the transition between natural language and abstract argumentation systems. Our aim is to place debates at the center of the decision analysis process in order to facilitate the acceptance of the final decision by all parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Delhomme & Franck Taillandier & Irène Abi-Zeid & Rallou Thomopoulos & Cédric Baudrit & Laurent Mora, 2017. "Designing an argumentative decision-aiding tool for urban planning. AIPA : an interface between multicriteria decision aiding and argumentative frameworks," Post-Print hal-01837517, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01837517
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01837517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01837517/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasmin Tremblay & Irène Abi-Zeid, 2016. "Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in Québec," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 233-253, January.
    2. Valerie Belton & Theodor Stewart, 2010. "Problem Structuring and Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira & Salvatore Greco (ed.), Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, chapter 0, pages 209-239, Springer.
    3. Helene Rey-Valette & Sebastien Damart & Sebastien Roussel, 2007. "A multicriteria participation-based methodology for selecting sustainable development indicators: an incentive tool for concerted decision making beyond the diagnosis framework," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1/2), pages 122-138.
    4. Jasmin Tremblay & Irène Abi-Zeid, 2016. "Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in Québec," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 233-253, January.
    5. Hutchel, Armand & Molet, Hughues, 1986. "Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision-making: About two case studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 178-186, January.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1903 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wassila Ouerdane & Nicolas Maudet & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2010. "Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira & Salvatore Greco (ed.), Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, chapter 0, pages 177-208, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    2. Rallou Thomopoulos, 2018. "A practical application approach to argumentation for multicriteria analysis and decision support," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 237-255, November.
    3. Fabien Jean & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2014. "Convince me or commit me? Avoid the cognitive trap induced by Non-Human Actors in early stages of NPD," Post-Print hal-00976059, HAL.
    4. McKenna, R. & Bertsch, V. & Mainzer, K. & Fichtner, W., 2018. "Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1092-1110.
    5. Bottero, M. & Ferretti, V. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Roy, B., 2015. "Dealing with a multiple criteria environmental problem with interaction effects between criteria through an extension of the Electre III method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 837-850.
    6. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments. Une analyse généalogique des approches théoriques fondées sur les instruments de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(3), pages 5-37., September.
    7. Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2007. "On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 3-27, October.
    8. Isabella M. Lami & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "How Can I Help You? Questioning the Role of Evaluation Techniques in Democratic Decision-Making Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Hermano Bernardo & Adélio Gaspar & Carlos Henggeler Antunes, 2018. "A Combined Value Focused Thinking-Soft Systems Methodology Approach to Structure Decision Support for Energy Performance Assessment of School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    11. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    12. Jean-Charles Billaut & Denis Bouyssou & Philippe Vincke, 2009. "Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? An MCDM view," Working Papers hal-00877050, HAL.
    13. Wulf, David & Bertsch, Valentin, 2016. "A natural language generation approach to support understanding and traceability of multi-dimensional preferential sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making," MPRA Paper 75025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2011. "Looking at management through its instruments," Post-Print hal-00639734, HAL.
    15. Blanche Segrestin & Franck Aggeri & Albert David & Pascal Le Masson, 2017. "Armand Hatchuel and the Refoundation of Management Research: Design Theory and the Epistemology of Collective Action," Post-Print hal-01516296, HAL.
    16. Thomas Gillier & Akın Kazakçı & Gérald Piat, 2014. "The generation of common purpose in innovation partnerships: a design perspective," Post-Print hal-00982992, HAL.
    17. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi & Rui Figueira, José, 2015. "Robust multi-criteria sorting with the outranking preference model and characteristic profiles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 126-140.
    18. Najoua Hammouch & Mehdi Nouri & Laurent Cappelletti & Abdellatif Marghich, 2021. "La recherche intervention : du terrain à la production de la connaissance," Post-Print hal-03334044, HAL.
    19. Yasmine Saleh, 2015. "Une charte éthique à l'épreuve du temps : analyse de l'évolution des « Principes d'Action » du groupe Lafarge," Working Papers hal-01120172, HAL.
    20. Majid Eskafi & Reza Fazeli & Ali Dastgheib & Poonam Taneja & Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson & Ragnheidur I. Thorarinsdottir & Gunnar Stefansson, 2020. "A value-based definition of success in adaptive port planning: a case study of the Port of Isafjordur in Iceland," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 403-431, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01837517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.