IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01515123.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Workplace stress from actual and desired computer-­mediated communication use: a multi-­method study

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Stich

    (ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Monideepa Tarafdar

    (Lancaster University, MIT Sloan - Sloan School of Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Cary Cooper

    (MBS - Manchester Business School - University of Manchester [Manchester])

  • Patrick Stacey

    (Loughborough University)

Abstract

The use of computer-mediated communication applications can lead to workplace stress for employees. However, such stress is influenced not only by how individuals actually use computer-mediated communication applications but also how they desire to use them. This article examines how the individual's actual and desired use of communication tools together influence his or her workplace stress. It does so across a range of computer-mediated media (e.g. email or instant messaging) and workplace stressors (e.g. workload or work relationships). This investigation is conducted using a multi-method research design. The quantitative study found that desired and actual use together influenced workplace stress, mostly for email, but not for other media. The qualitative study further showed that such influence depends on organisational conditions such as available media or co-workers preferences. The findings emphasise the importance of considering the individuals' desired use of CMC media and their subjective appraisals of different media.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Stich & Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary Cooper & Patrick Stacey, 2017. "Workplace stress from actual and desired computer-­mediated communication use: a multi-­method study," Post-Print hal-01515123, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01515123
    DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12079
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01515123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01515123/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ntwe.12079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerem Teksen & Necati Cemaloglu, 2023. "Mobbing and Social Network Analysis," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 184-194, January.
    2. Jean-François Stich & Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary Cooper, 2018. "Electronic communication in the workplace: boon or bane?," Post-Print hal-01725240, HAL.
    3. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Singh, Pallavi & Bala, Hillol & Dey, Bidit Lal & Filieri, Raffaele, 2022. "Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 269-286.
    5. Yujing Liu & Jing Du & Jin Nam Choi & Yuan Li, 2022. "Can I Get Back Later or Turn It Off? Day-Level Effect of Remote Communication Autonomy on Sustainable Proactivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01515123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.