IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01188580.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'utilité perçue du concept de business model par les analystes financiers

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Charlotte Disle

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Philippe Protin

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the perceived usefulness of the concept of business model (BM) in the field of financial reporting, using a qualitative analysis based on interviews of a panel of financial analysts. They manage to define the BM but consider it as incomplete, especially regarding the competitive dimension of the market. They acknowledge the BM as a useful concept for completing their financial analysis of firms and support its integration within financial reporting based on additional information rather than accounting recognition. However, they emphasize the need for accounting regulation thanks to the discretionary nature of the BM and their reluctance concerning the reliability and understandability of such information.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Charlotte Disle & Philippe Protin, 2015. "L'utilité perçue du concept de business model par les analystes financiers," Post-Print hal-01188580, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01188580
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01188580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01188580/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Martinez, 2004. "Le contenu informatif des chiffres comptables : vers de nouvelles améliorations méthodologiques ?," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 10(2), pages 9-30.
    2. Malone, Thomas & Weill, Peter & Lai, Richard & D'Urso, Victoria & Herman, George & Apel, Thomas & Woerner, Stephanie, 2006. "Do Some Business Models Perform Better than Others?," MPRA Paper 4751, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Amir, Eli & Lev, Baruch, 1996. "Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 3-30, October.
    4. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    5. Anne Cazavan-Jeny & Thomas Jeanjean, 2004. "Pertinence de l'inscription à l'actif des frais de R1D : une étude empirique," Post-Print halshs-00593826, HAL.
    6. Sébastien Rocher, 2011. "Grandeur et décadence de la consolidation des comptes dans le secteur public local français," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 17(2), pages 137-159.
    7. Frédéric Bertrand & Charlotte Disle & Nathalie Gonthier Besacier & Stéphane Périer & Philippe Protin, 2012. "Business Model et information financière," Post-Print halshs-00853789, HAL.
    8. Michael Page, 2014. "Business models as a basis for regulation of financial reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 683-695, August.
    9. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2008. "(Re)penser le développement des organisations. Les apports du modèle économique," Post-Print hal-00289646, HAL.
    10. Frédéric Bertrand & Charlotte Disle & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Stéphane Périer & Philippe Protin, 2012. "Business Model et information financière," Post-Print hal-00691184, HAL.
    11. Yosra Bejar, 2009. "Publication d'informations sur le capital immatériel et attentes des investisseurs : une étude exploratoire par la méthode Delphi," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 15(2), pages 165-192.
    12. Beattie, Vivien & Smith, Sarah Jane, 2013. "Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 243-254.
    13. Christine A. Botosan & Marlene A. Plumlee, 2002. "A Re‐examination of Disclosure Level and the Expected Cost of Equity Capital," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 21-40, March.
    14. AfDB AfDB, 2008. "List of Working Paper Series (1 - 95)," Working Paper Series 356, African Development Bank.
    15. Lev, B & Zarowin, P, 1999. "The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 353-385.
    16. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    17. Mary E. Barth & Ron Kasznik & Maureen F. McNichols, 2001. "Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-34, June.
    18. Pascal Dumontier & Bernard Raffournier, 2002. "Accounting and capital markets: a survey of the European evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3892 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Yosra Bejar, 2009. "Publication d'informations sur le capital immatériel et attentes des investisseurs : une étude exploratoire par la méthode Delphi," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 15(2), pages 165-192.
    21. Emma Garcia-meca & Isabel Parra & Manuel Larran & Isabel Martinez, 2005. "The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analysts," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 63-94.
    22. Judith Saghroun & Jean-Yves Eglem, 2008. "À la recherche de la performance globale de l'entreprise : la perception des analystes financiers," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 14(1), pages 93-118.
    23. Judith Saghroun & Jean-Yves Eglem, 2008. "À la recherche de la performance globale de l'entreprise : la perception des analystes financiers," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 14(1), pages 93-118.
    24. Sébastien Rocher, 2011. "Grandeur et décadence de la consolidation des comptes dans le secteur public local français," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 17(2), pages 137-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlotte Disle & Philippe Protin & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Frédéric Bertrand & Stéphane Périer, 2016. "Divulgation volontaire sur le Business model : le cas des entreprises du CAC40," Post-Print hal-01900531, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlotte Disle & Philippe Protin & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Frédéric Bertrand & Stéphane Périer, 2016. "Divulgation volontaire sur le Business model : le cas des entreprises du CAC40," Post-Print hal-01900531, HAL.
    2. Frédéric Bertrand & Charlotte Disle & Nathalie Gonthier Besacier & Stéphane Périer & Philippe Protin, 2012. "Business Model et information financière," Post-Print halshs-00853789, HAL.
    3. Frédéric Bertrand & Charlotte Disle & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Stéphane Périer & Philippe Protin, 2012. "Business Model et information financière," Post-Print hal-00691184, HAL.
    4. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2019. "Does Equity Market Differently Perceive IC Management and Disclosure Behaviours?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 756-775, June.
    5. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D?Amico & Sabato Vinci, 2019. "The effectiveness of intellectual capital disclosure in market assessments of corporate value creation," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 5-35.
    6. Thorsten Knauer & Arnt Wöhrmann, 2010. "Rahmenbedingungen, Charakteristika und Konsequenzen freiwilliger Unternehmenspublizität – State of the Art und neue Perspektiven der empirischen Forschung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 235-254, November.
    7. Kang, Helen H. & Gray, Sidney J., 2011. "Reporting intangible assets: Voluntary disclosure practices of top emerging market companies," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 402-423.
    8. Mustafa Ciftci & Nan Zhou, 2016. "Capitalizing R&D expenses versus disclosing intangible information," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 661-689, April.
    9. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Van Geyt, Debby & Van Cauwenberge, Philippe & Vander Bauwhede, Heidi, 2014. "Does high-quality corporate communication reduce insider trading profitability?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Mishari M. Alfaraih & Faisal S. Alanezi, 2011. "Does Voluntary Disclosure Level Affect The Value Relevance Of Accounting Information?," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(2), pages 65-84.
    12. Lorenzo Simoni & Laura Bini & Francesco Giunta, 2019. "The effects of business model regulation on the value relevance of traditional performance measures. Some evidence from UK companies," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 83-111.
    13. Feng, Cong & Fay, Scott & Kashmiri, Saim, 2022. "The value relevance of descriptive R&D intensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1394-1407.
    14. Shan Zhou & Roger Simnett & Wendy Green, 2017. "Does Integrated Reporting Matter to the Capital Market?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 94-132, March.
    15. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2016. "Theoretical foundation of IC disclosure strategies in high-tech industries," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Kumar, Gaurav, 2013. "Voluntary disclosures of intangibles information by U.S.-listed Asian companies," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 109-118.
    17. Kannan, Yezen & Khallaf, Ashraf & Gleason, Kimberly & Bostan, Ibrahim, 2023. "The relationship between R&D intensity, conservatism, and management earnings forecast issuance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Asdemir, Ozer & Fernando, Guy D & Schneible, Richard A. & Tripathy, Arindam, 2017. "Impact of strategy on analyst information," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 103-110.
    19. Bushee, Brian J. & Matsumoto, Dawn A. & Miller, Gregory S., 2003. "Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 149-180, January.
    20. Gaëlle Lenormand & Lionel Touchais, 2008. "La pertinence des actifs incorporels avec les IFRS," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(2), pages 173-201, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulation; financial reporting; Business Model; normalisation; communication financière;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01188580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.