IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00738261.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Basel Accord and The Value of Bank Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Hege

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Eberhard Feess

Abstract

The authors investigate optimal capital requirements in a model in which banks decide on their investment in credit scoring systems. The main result is that regulators should encourage sophisticated banks to keep their asset portfolios safe, while assets with high systematic risk should be concentrated in smaller banks. The proposed regulatory differentiation follows the Basel Accord's distinction between internal ratings-based approach and standard approach. Sophisticated banks should increase their equity capital relative to other banks, leading to further size differentiation. The moral hazard problem of banks misrepresenting their loan portfolio risk is analyzed, with the result that it induces stricter capital requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Hege & Eberhard Feess, 2012. "The Basel Accord and The Value of Bank Differentiation," Post-Print hal-00738261, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00738261
    DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfr002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barth, Andreas & Seckinger, Christian, 2018. "Capital regulation with heterogeneous banks – Unintended consequences of a too strict leverage ratio," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 455-465.
    2. Fabiana Gómez & Jorge Ponce, 2019. "Regulation and Bankers’ Incentives," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 56(3), pages 209-227, December.
    3. Jean-Edouard Colliard, 2019. "Strategic Selection of Risk Models and Bank Capital Regulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2591-2606, June.
    4. Eberhard Feess & Ansgar Wohlschlegel, 2018. "Bank capital requirements and mandatory deferral of compensation," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 206-242, April.
    5. Chaiporn Vithessonthi, 2016. "The Consequences of Bank Loan Growth: Evidence from Asia," PIER Discussion Papers 19., Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Feb 2016.
    6. Ahnert, Toni & Chapman, James & Wilkins, Carolyn, 2021. "Should bank capital regulation be risk sensitive?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    7. Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, 2023. "The consequences of bank loan growth: Evidence from Asia," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 252-270.
    8. Vasilios Sogiakas, 2017. "Basel III impact on the Italian banking sector," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 51-55.
    9. Ahmad Raza Bilal & Noraini Bt. Abu Talib & Mohd Noor Azli Ali Khan, 2013. "Remodeling of risk management in banking: evidence from the sub-continent and gulf," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(5), pages 468-489, November.
    10. Stephanos Papadamou & Dimitrios Sogiakas & Vasilios Sogiakas & Kanellos Toudas, 2021. "The prudential role of Basel III liquidity provisions towards financial stability," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 1133-1153, November.
    11. Dal Borgo, Mariela, 2022. "Internal models for deposits: Effects on banks' capital and interest rate risk of assets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Viola Nobili, 2017. "Discretionary Accruals in Italian Private Firms and Non-Linear Bank Loan Granting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 83-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00738261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.