IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00621061.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Goodness-of-Fit tests with Dependent Observations

Author

Listed:
  • Rémy Chicheportiche

    (Science et Finance - Science et Finance, MAS - Mathématiques Appliquées aux Systèmes - EA 4037 - Ecole Centrale Paris, FiQuant - Chaire de finance quantitative - MICS - Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes - CentraleSupélec)

  • Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

    (Science et Finance - Science et Finance)

Abstract

We revisit the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises goodness-of-fit (GoF) tests and propose a generalisation to identically distributed, but dependent univariate random variables. We show that the dependence leads to a reduction of the "effective" number of independent observations. The generalised GoF tests are not distribution-free but rather depend on all the lagged bivariate copulas. These objects, that we call "self-copulas", encode all the non-linear temporal dependences. We introduce a specific, log-normal model for these self-copulas, for which a number of analytical results are derived. An application to financial time series is provided. As is well known, the dependence is to be long-ranged in this case, a finding that we confirm using self-copulas. As a consequence, the acceptance rates for GoF tests are substantially higher than if the returns were iid random variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Rémy Chicheportiche & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2011. "Goodness-of-Fit tests with Dependent Observations," Post-Print hal-00621061, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00621061
    DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/09/P09003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hong & Wu, Zheyang, 2022. "The general goodness-of-fit tests for correlated data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Partida, Alberto & Gerassis, Saki & Criado, Regino & Romance, Miguel & Giráldez, Eduardo & Taboada, Javier, 2022. "The chaotic, self-similar and hierarchical patterns in Bitcoin and Ethereum price series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    3. Michele Caraglio & Fulvio Baldovin & Attilio L. Stella, 2021. "How Fast Does the Clock of Finance Run?—A Time-Definition Enforcing Stationarity and Quantifying Overnight Duration," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Chicheportiche, Rémy & Chakraborti, Anirban, 2017. "A model-free characterization of recurrences in stationary time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 474(C), pages 312-318.
    5. Morales, Raffaello & Di Matteo, T. & Gramatica, Ruggero & Aste, Tomaso, 2012. "Dynamical generalized Hurst exponent as a tool to monitor unstable periods in financial time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3180-3189.
    6. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2021. "Radical Complexity," Papers 2103.09692, arXiv.org.
    7. Dangxing Chen, 2019. "Does the leverage effect affect the return distribution?," Papers 1909.08662, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    8. Vance Martin & Yoshihiko Nishiyama & John Stachurski, 2011. "A Goodness of Fit Test for Ergodic Markov Processes," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2011-557, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    9. Alex D Washburne & Joshua W Burby & Daniel Lacker, 2016. "Novel Covariance-Based Neutrality Test of Time-Series Data Reveals Asymmetries in Ecological and Economic Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00621061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.