IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/frz/wpaper/wp2018_23.rdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Assessment of Agro-food Frauds in the Italian Economy: A SAM-based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Benedetto Rocchi
  • Donato Romano
  • Ahmad Sadiddin
  • Gianluca Stefani

Abstract

Building on the Italian input-output table, and using structural information on agro-food production sub-sectors from several sources, a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) model for the Italian economy has been developed, disaggregating the agro-food sector into agricultural production activities and ten different agro-food value chains (VCs). Then, using primary data by the Central Inspectorate for Quality Protection and Fraud Repression in Agro-Food Products (Ispettorato Centrale per la Qualità e la Repressioni delle Frodi, ICQRF) of the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, we assessed the economic size of fraudulent agro-food output, estimated the size of the economy depending on fraudulent production, and simulated the impacts of agro-food frauds on the national economy in terms of GDP, employment and income distribution. The analysis shows that the wine value chain is the sub-sector most exposed to frauds accounting for 88% of the total value of seized agro-food outputs. Second ranks olive oil value chain (6% of total seizures), while the other VCs accounts for only the remaining 6% of total seizures. The shares change slightly when the values of irregular products were expanded to the population levels. The results of the SAM simulations shows that the share of economy directly and indirectly linked to supply of irregular food products accounts for 0.5% of total value of output, while in terms of value added the share of irregular food products ranges between 0.1% and 0.4% of total value added. This corresponds to a value of 1.9 billion euro (considering only seizures) to 13.9 billion euro (including all irregularities) and is able to activate a up to 156 thousand labour units in the worst-case scenario. In terms of the share relative to the agro-food sector, the total output "driven" by irregular products is much higher accounting for 3.2% of output and 5.8% of employment. Results from the counterfactual analysis shows that agro-food frauds caused a losses of 1.8 billion euro in terms of total output, corresponding to about 20 thousands of full time labour units. The net impact on GDP is positive though very small since the earnings feed rent-seeking activities instead of strengthening linkages with the rest of the economy. Household incomes are reduced by only 0.01%. However, considering that consumers build their own perceptions on the basis of a mix of quality and health considerations, the potential losses in cases of food scandals would be much more tangible. These results show that fighting agro-food frauds is justified on efficiency as well as equity ground.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedetto Rocchi & Donato Romano & Ahmad Sadiddin & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "An Assessment of Agro-food Frauds in the Italian Economy: A SAM-based Approach," Working Papers - Economics wp2018_23.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
  • Handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2018_23.rdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.disei.unifi.it/upload/sub/pubblicazioni/repec/pdf/wp23_2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zucaro, Raffaella & Manganiello, Veronica, 2017. "The Impact of Agro-food Frauds on the Italian Economy," 2017 Sixth AIEAA Conference, June 15-16, Piacenza, Italy 261260, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2018_23.rdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Ricchiuti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/defirit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.