IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fir/econom/wp2024_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

No socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Careggi Hospital, Italy

Author

Abstract

Objective . Several studies have shown stark socio-economic disparities in births born via assisted reproduction technology (ART), but only a few have investigated underlying causes. We study the likelihood of ART treatment success as a possible explanation. Design . Observational study of center-based data. We consider women undergoing ART treatment at the ART-center in Careggi Hospital, Tuscany. Outcome Measures . Probability of a conception following an ART treatment; probability of abortion after conception; and probability of a live birth after an ART treatment. Results . The findings indicate no socio-economic disparity between patients with a high and low socio-economic status in the probability of achieving a successful ART treatment in terms of the probability of conception (β=0.02; 95% CI, -0.02, 0.06; P=0.362), abortion (β=-0.02; 95% CI, -0.08, 0.04; P=0.542) and live birth (β=0.02; 95% CI, -0.02, 0.06; P=0.291). The results also hold when focusing on patients at first treatment, only among natives, and by age groups. Conclusions . Our findings suggest that within a public clinic providing subsidized access to treatments, socio-economic differences in the proportion of ART births may not stem from disparities in treatment success rates. Rather, other determinants relating to access to ART treatment such as geographical barriers, cultural preferences or knowledge about treatment success may play a larger role.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Cozzani & Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Emilia Giusti & Sara Landini & Francesca Piazzini & Valentina Tocchioni & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "No socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Careggi Hospital, Italy," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2024_04, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    • Handle: RePEc:fir:econom:wp2024_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://labdisia.disia.unifi.it/wp_disia/2024/wp_disia_2024_04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024-04
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentina Tocchioni & Anna Rybińska & Monika Mynarska & Anna Matysiak & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Life-Course Trajectories of Childless Women: Country-Specific or Universal?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 1315-1332, December.
    2. Alice Goisis & Peter Fallesen & Marta Seiz & Leire Salazar & Tatiana Eremenko & Marco Cozzani, 2023. "Educational gradients in the prevalence of Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) births in a comparative perspective," JRC Working Papers on Social Classes in the Digital Age 2023-06, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Ester Lazzari & Edith Gray & Georgina Chambers, 2021. "The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(35), pages 1081-1096.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10510 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cozzani, Marco & Coccia, Maria Elisabetta & Giusti, Emilia & Landini, Sara & Piazzini, Francesca & , Valentina & Vignoli, Daniele, 2024. "No socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Careggi Hospital, Italy," SocArXiv vseq2, Center for Open Science.
    2. Katherine Tierney & Ester Lazzari, 2024. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Medically Assisted Live Birth Rates in the United States in 2020 and 2021," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Ester Lazzari & Michaela Potančoková & Tomáš Sobotka & Edith Gray & Georgina M. Chambers, 2023. "Projecting the Contribution of Assisted Reproductive Technology to Completed Cohort Fertility," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Brini, Elisa & Borgen, Solveig Topstad & Borgen, Nicolai T., 2023. "Avoiding the eyeballing fallacy: Visualizing statistical differences between estimates using the pheatplot command," SocArXiv fghcd, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ART; treatment success; social disparities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fir:econom:wp2024_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Cipollini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsfirit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.