IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id4971.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Where There Is No Health Research: What Can Be Done to Fill the Global Gaps in Health Research?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin McKee
  • David Stuckler
  • Sanjay Basu

Abstract

Efforts to strengthen capacity in health research have, so far, concentrated on countries where there is existing capacity rather than those where it is almost completely lacking. Judged by absolute numbers of scientific papers, those with the fewest are mainly small islands and a few countries that are politically isolated. Judged by papers per capita, the lowest include countries in the former Soviet Union and Africa, both regions experiencing declines in life expectancy in recent years, and states experiencing conflict. Although there is a positive association between economic development and research output, some relatively wealthy countries seriously underperform. There are many examples of good practice, including regional networks and international partnerships. There is a strong argument for donors to look to the long term and consider how best to build health research capacity where it is virtually absent. [Plos Medicine]. URL:[http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001209]

Suggested Citation

  • Martin McKee & David Stuckler & Sanjay Basu, 2012. "Where There Is No Health Research: What Can Be Done to Fill the Global Gaps in Health Research?," Working Papers id:4971, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:4971
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2012510113448_20.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=4971&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johan Bollen & Herbert Van de Sompel & Aric Hagberg & Ryan Chute, 2009. "A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martine AUDIBERT & Marlène GUILLON & Jacky MATHONNAT, 2018. "The challenge of improving efficiency of Soum Health Centers in Mongolia," Working Papers P226, FERDI.
    2. Charles C. Ezenduka & Obinna E. Onwujekwe, 2022. "Evaluating a capacity development intervention in health economics among producers and users of evidence in Nigeria: a case study in Getting Research Into Policy and Practice (GRIPP) in Anambra State," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Aviane Auguste & Glenn Jones & Dorothy Phillip & James St. Catherine & Elizabeth Dos Santos & Owen Gabriel & Carlene Radix, 2021. "Difficulties in Accessing Cancer Care in a Small Island State: A Community-Based Pilot Study of Cancer Survivors in Saint Lucia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Martine Audibert & Marlène Guillon & Jacky Mathonnat, 2018. "The challenge of improving efficiency of Soum Health Centers in Mongolia - What data tell us for Soum Health Centers in five provinces?," Working Papers hal-01795645, HAL.
    5. Kathleen Van Royen & Carl Lachat & Michelle Holdsworth & Karlien Smit & Joyce Kinabo & Dominique Roberfroid & Eunice Nago & Christopher Garimoi Orach & Patrick Kolsteren, 2013. "How Can the Operating Environment for Nutrition Research Be Improved in Sub-Saharan Africa? The Views of African Researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Martine Audibert & Marlène Guillon & Jacky Mathonnat, 2018. "The challenge of improving efficiency of Soum Health Centers in Mongolia - What data tell us for Soum Health Centers in five provinces?," Post-Print hal-01795645, HAL.
    7. Rony Zachariah & Stefanie Rust & Selma Dar Berger & Nathalie Guillerm & Karen Bissell & Paul Delaunois & Anthony J Reid & Ajay M V Kumar & Piero L Olliaro & John C Reeder & Anthony D Harries & Andrew , 2016. "Building Global Capacity for Conducting Operational Research Using the SORT IT Model: Where and Who?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Martine AUDIBERT & Marlène GUILLON & Jacky MATHONNAT, 2018. "The challenge of improving efficiency of Soum Health Centers in Mongolia," Working Papers P226, FERDI.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Star X. & Rousseau, Ronald & Ye, Fred Y., 2011. "h-Degree as a basic measure in weighted networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 668-677.
    2. Kaur, Jasleen & Radicchi, Filippo & Menczer, Filippo, 2013. "Universality of scholarly impact metrics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 924-932.
    3. Barbara McGillivray & Mathias Astell, 2019. "The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 817-838, November.
    4. Tamara Krajna & Jelka Petrak, 2019. "Croatian Highly Cited Papers," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(3-B), pages 684-696.
    5. Walters, William H., 2017. "Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 730-744.
    6. Alberto Anfossi & Alberto Ciolfi & Filippo Costa & Giorgio Parisi & Sergio Benedetto, 2016. "Large-scale assessment of research outputs through a weighted combination of bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 671-683, May.
    7. Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2018. "The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher’s performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1282-1295.
    8. Battiston, Pietro & Sacco, Pier Luigi & Stanca, Luca, 2022. "Cover effects on citations uncovered: Evidence from Nature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    9. Gangan Prathap, 2019. "The Pinski–Narin influence weight and the Ramanujacharyulu power-weakness ratio indicators revisited," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1173-1185, May.
    10. Enrique Orduña-Malea, 2021. "Dot-science top level domain: Academic websites or dumpsites?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3565-3591, April.
    11. Bornmann, Lutz & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2013. "The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 286-291.
    12. Francis Bloch & Matthew O. Jackson & Pietro Tebaldi, 2023. "Centrality measures in networks," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 413-453, August.
    13. Jerome K. Vanclay, 2012. "Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(2), pages 211-238, August.
    14. Ana Teresa Santos & Sandro Mendonça, 2022. "Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7449-7470, December.
    15. Ortega, José Luis, 2018. "The life cycle of altmetric impact: A longitudinal study of six metrics from PlumX," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 579-589.
    16. Katarzyna Cheba, 2015. "The Influence Of Clusters On Economic Development. A Comparative Analysis Of Cluster Policy In The European Union And Japan," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 6(3), pages 73-88, September.
    17. Cameron Neylon & Shirley Wu, 2009. "Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-6, November.
    18. B Ian Hutchins & Xin Yuan & James M Anderson & George M Santangelo, 2016. "Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2014. "Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1043-1065, November.
    20. Hall, C. Michael & Page, Stephen J., 2015. "Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 309-312.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:4971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.