IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id12920.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rationale and Institution for Public – Private Partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Jungwook Kim

Abstract

Private–public partnership (PPP) methods are considered to be an effective way to narrow the gap between demand and supply of social infrastructure. If successfully pursued, PPP can deliver benefits to users, governments, and the private sector, or the so-called triple wins. Enhancing efficiency by reducing cost and time overruns is beneficial to users and governments, and better quality of service is expected via PPP. It will also examine the factors that have been important for shaping the county’s PPP landscape, including fiscal soundness, unsolicited project proposals, and the refinancing and renegotiation of PPPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungwook Kim, 2018. "Rationale and Institution for Public – Private Partnerships," Working Papers id:12920, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12920
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2018919134233_29.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=12920&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Estache & Juan Manuel Campos & Nadine Martin & Lourdes Trujillo, 2003. "Macroeconomic Effects of Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/44067, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. John T. Hodges & Georgina Dellacha, 2007. "Unsolicited infrastructure proposals : how some countries introduce competition and transparency," World Bank Publications - Reports 10718, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Rodriguez, 2019. "Defining Governance in Latin America," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 5-19, March.
    2. Havard Halland & John Beardsworth & Bryan Land & James Schmidt, 2014. "Resource Financed Infrastructure : A Discussion on a New Form of Infrastructure Financing [Infrastructures financées par des ressources naturelles : Examen d'un nouveau mode de financement des infr," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18554, December.
    3. Emmanuelle Auriol & Pierre M. Picard, 2008. "Infrastructure and Public Utilities Privatization in Developing Countries," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 23(1), pages 77-100, November.
    4. Yeon-Koo Che & Elisabetta Iossa & Patrick Rey, 2021. "Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation [Subgame Perfect Implementation Under Information Perturbations]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2149-2178.
    5. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Blanc, Aymeric, 2009. "Capture and corruption in public utilities: The cases of water and electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 203-216, June.
    6. Takano, Guillermo, 2021. "The competitive performance of public-private partnership markets. The case of unsolicited proposals in Peru," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Estache, Antonio & Serebrisky, Tomas, 2004. "Where do we stand on transport infrastructure deregulation and public-private partnership?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3356, The World Bank.
    8. Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz, 2012. "Control mechanisms exercised in Malaysian housing public-private partnerships," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 37-55, December.
    9. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Sander Lenferink & Wim Leendertse & Jos Arts & Taede Tillema, 2014. "Public--Private Plan Development: Can Early Private Involvement Strengthen Infrastructure Planning?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 323-344, February.
    11. Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2009. "Toward a Theory of Regulation for Developing Countries: Following Jean-Jacques Laffont's Lead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 729-770, September.
    12. World Bank Group, 2016. "Benchmarking Public-Private Partnerships Procurement 2017," World Bank Publications - Reports 25089, The World Bank Group.
    13. Antonio Estache, 2006. "PPI Partnerships vs. PPI Divorces in LDCs," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 29(1), pages 3-26, September.
    14. Cledan Mandri-Perrott & Iain Menzies, 2010. "Private Sector Participation in Light Rail-Light Metro Transit Initiatives," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2416, December.
    15. Cesar Queiroz & Ada Karina Izaguirre, 2008. "Worldwide Trends in Private Participation in Roads : Growing Activity, Growing Government Support," World Bank Publications - Reports 10607, The World Bank Group.
    16. Kangsoo Kim & Jinoh Kim & Donghyung Yook, 2021. "Analysis of Features Affecting Contracted Rate of Return of Korean PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Javier Alonso & Jasmina Bjeletic & Carlos Herrera & Soledad Hormazabal & Ivonne Ordonez & Carolina Romero & David Tuesta, 2010. "A Balance of Pension Fund Infrastructure Investments: The Experience in Latin America," Working Papers 1003, BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department.
    18. John Nellis, 2006. "Privatization: A Summary Assessment," Working Papers 87, Center for Global Development.
    19. Cesar Queiroz & Nevena Vajdic & Goran Mladenovic, 2013. "Public--private partnerships in roads and government support: trends in transition and developing economies," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 231-243, April.
    20. Takano, Guillermo, 2017. "Public-Private Partnerships as rent-seeking opportunities: A case study on an unsolicited proposal in Lima, Peru," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-194.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.