Taxing Europe: Two cases for a European power to tax (with some comparative observations)
AbstractThis paper considers the need for granting the European Union a genuine power to tax. The argument is developed in several steps. First, it is shown that the granting of such a power to tax is both legally mandated and legally framed . In stark contrast to classical international organisations, or for that purpose, to the Articles of Confederation, the Communities were expected to acquire full taxing and spending powers. Special attention is paid to the affirmation of the principle of social and economic cohesion as one of the fundamental principles of Community law. Second, it is argued that the development of a genuine EU power of taxation is normatively desirable . The positive normative properties of a European power to tax are unfolded in two reform cases: the modest and the ambitious cases of reform. The principle of no public expenditure without taxation is shown to require the financing of the present European budget through taxes. A proper determination of requirements of distributive justice in a complex political community is said to defend a larger European budget, aimed at the redistribution of economic resources among the citizens of the European Union. Third, the two cases of reform are prudentially advisable . Redistributive taxation is the price of European civilisation. It constitutes a basic precondition for the successful consolidation of the Union as a political community, and for the proper integration of new members once enlargement to the East is fully effective. A summary look to the American case further shows that the creation of supranational institutions tends to lead to the establishment of central powers to tax. Those tend to be reinforced once the question of distributive fairness in the allocation of public burdens becomes a central one in the political agenda (as it was the case in the United States from, at the very least, the turn of the XXth century). Fourth, the two cases of reforms are feasible . Legal, normative and prudential criteria point to the (partial) transfer to the Union of the power to tax savings income and corporate income.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ARENA in its series ARENA Working Papers with number 3.
Date of creation: 01 Feb 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.arena.uio.no/
tax policy; European law; positive integration; supranationalism;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sindre Eikrem Hervig) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Sindre Eikrem Hervig to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.