IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/11979.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reforming the EU�s Budget Revenue: The case for a visible VAT-based resource

Author

Listed:
  • Cipriani, Gabriele

Abstract

This paper finds that the long-awaited reform of the EU�s revenue arrangements can be pursued within the current legal framework, thus keeping member states� fiscal sovereignty unaffected. In order to have a chance of approval by national parliaments, the author recommends that reform options should concentrate on known grounds and operational solutions. These include providing a reliable estimate of potential revenue and expected burden sharing as compared with the current arrangements. A key issue is whether the EU budget should be financed by a visible fiscal source. Making citizens directly liable for funding the EU budget would represent a major political decision. This study argues that the value added tax provides an operational solution to ensure the visibility of EU contributions without increasing the overall tax burden. Since EU revenue and expenditure are set as a comprehensive package, there is also a need to consider the extent to which the current spending programmes provide the best value and achieve objectives of common interest with demonstrable results. Such assessment should inspire the proposal for the multiannual financial framework after 2020, to be presented by the Commission in about a year�s time.

Suggested Citation

  • Cipriani, Gabriele, 2016. "Reforming the EU�s Budget Revenue: The case for a visible VAT-based resource," CEPS Papers 11979, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:11979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/SR150%20GC%20EU%20Budget%20Financing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clemens Fuest & Friedrich Heinemann & Martin Ungerer, 2015. "Reforming the Financing of the European Union: A Proposal," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 50(5), pages 288-293, September.
    2. Ferrer, Jorge N��ez, 2012. "Investing where it matters: An EU Budget for Long-Term Growth," CEPS Papers 6648, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    3. Massimo Bordignon & Simona Scabrosetti, 2016. "The Political Economy of Financing the EU budget," Working papers 42, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta, 2020. "Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–2027," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(3), pages 193-208, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Núñez Ferrer & Jacques Le Cacheux & Giacomo Benedetto & Mathieu Saunier & Fabien Candau & Claude Emonnot & Florence Lachet-Touya & Jorgen Mortensen & Aymeric Potteau & Igor Taranic, 2016. "Study on the potential and limitations of reforming the financing of the EU budget [Perspectives et limites pour réformer le financement du budget de l’UE]," Working Papers hal-01848029, HAL.
    2. Jorge Núñez Ferrer & Jacques Le Cacheux & Giacomo Benedetto & Mathieu Saunier & Fabien Candau & Claude Emonnot & Florence Lachet-Touya & Jorgen Mortensen & Aymeric Potteau & Igor Taranic, 2016. "Study on the potential and limitations of reforming the financing of the EU budget
      [Perspectives et limites pour réformer le financement du budget de l’UE]      ," Working Papers hal-01848029, HAL.
    3. Alexander Krenek & Mark Sommer & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2019. "Sustainability-oriented Future EU Funding. A European Border Carbon Adjustment," WIFO Working Papers 587, WIFO.
    4. Veronika Solilová & Danuše Nerudová, 2018. "Výnosový potenciál společného konsolidovaného korporátního základu daně v Evropské unii [Revenue Potential of the CCCTB in the European Union]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(1), pages 78-98.
    5. Massimo Bordignon & Simona Scabrosetti, 2016. "The Political Economy of Financing the EU budget," Working papers 42, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    6. Kengyel, Ákos, 2019. "Az Európai Unió költségvetésének jövője a 2021-2027-es többéves pénzügyi keret tükrében [The future of the EU budget in the light of the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 521-550.
    7. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2017. "The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), its Structure and the Own Resources," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60722, April.
    8. Marco Catola & Pietro Guarnieri & Veronica Pizziol & Chiara Rapallini, 2023. "Measuring the attitude towards a European public budget: A cross-country experiment," Discussion Papers 2023/300, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    9. Alexander Krenek & Mark Sommer & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2021. "A WTO-compatible Border Tax Adjustment for the ETS to Finance the EU Budget," WIFO Working Papers 596, WIFO.
    10. Veronika Solilová & Danuše Nerudová & Marian Dobranschi, 2017. "Sustainability-oriented future EU funding: a financial transaction tax," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 687-731, November.
    11. Alexander Hudetz & Ann Mumford & Danuse Nerudová & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2017. "Reform needs and options in the EU system of own resources," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 609-613, November.
    12. Giacomo Benedetto, 2017. "Institutions and the route to reform of the European Union’s budget revenue, 1970–2017," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 615-633, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:11979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.