IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/1450.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Satisfaction Attainment Theory as a Model for Value Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Briggs, R.O.
  • Qureshi, S.
  • Reinig, B.

Abstract

Organizations exist to create value for their stakeholders that stakeholders cannot create through individual effort. Information systems exist to increase an organization’s ability to create value using intellectual capital. A theoretical explanation of value might therefore be useful to increase the likelihood that IS/IT professionals would design and deploy systems in ways that increase value for stakeholders. This paper proposes Satisfaction Attainment Theory (SAT) as causal model of value creation. An organizational stakeholder is a person whose wellbeing might be advanced by an organization. Perceptions of value have reference to some object-of-value. The term, object, in the context of this paper, means anything to which one could ascribe value – e.g. goods, services, states, or outcomes. SAT assumes that people hold multiple, conflicting goals, and so must sacrifice the yield of some goal to attain others. It posits that an individual automatically and subconsciously sets an expectation for some level of utility from attaining a goal and assesses the likelihood that a goal will be attained. It also posits that individuals automatically and subconsciously assess yield the yield of a Set of Salient Goals (SSG). Any perceived Shift in the Yield Assessment (SYA) for the salient set of goals is automatically accompanied by an affective arousal proportional to and with a valence in the direction of the perceived SYA. SAT proposes that the value of an object is a positive function of the SYA that occurs when an individual contemplates sacrificing the yield of other goals to obtain the yield that could be derived from the object. Value is therefore created by making an individual aware of an opportunity to attain a positive SYA by sacrificing the yield of one set of goals to attain the yield of another set.

Suggested Citation

  • Briggs, R.O. & Qureshi, S. & Reinig, B., 2004. "Satisfaction Attainment Theory as a Model for Value Creation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2004-062-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:1450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/1450/ERS%202004%20062%20LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whitaker, Albert Conser, 1904. "History and Criticism of the Labor Theory of Value in English Political Economy," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number whitaker1904.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. L. Kolfschoten & P. Grünbacher & R. O. Briggs, 2011. "Modifiers for Quality Assurance in Group Facilitation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 685-705, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saverio M Fratini, 2018. "Sraffa on the degeneration of the notion of cost [The ultimate standard of value]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 817-836.
    2. Wylie Bradford, 2012. "The economics of Rawlsian justice: can it be neoclassical?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 612-623, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    affective response; goal assessment; satisfaction attainment theory (SAT); shift in the yield assessment (SYA); value creation; yield assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D29 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Other
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:1450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.