IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/87253.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South

Author

Listed:
  • Goodwin, Geoff

Abstract

Over the last two decades a rich and diverse body of literature has emerged which uses the ‘double movement’ to analyse social, political and economic change in the global South. The main aims of this article are to expand the boundaries of this scholarship and improve our understanding of how to use the concept to analyse capitalist development in the region. It seeks to achieve this by explaining and extending the original formulation of the double movement, creating a dialogue between scholars who follow alternative readings of the concept, and proposing a revised formulation which builds on the existing literature while moving in new directions. The article concludes by signposting potentially fruitful areas of Polanyian analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodwin, Geoff, 2018. "Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87253, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:87253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87253/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Stewart (QEH), "undated". "Do we need a new 'Great Transformation'? Is one likely?," QEH Working Papers qehwps136, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    2. Benjamin Selwyn & Satoshi Miyamura, 2014. "Class Struggle or Embedded Markets? Marx, Polanyi and the Meanings and Possibilities of Social Transformation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 639-661, September.
    3. Goodwin, Geoff, 2017. "The quest to bring land under social and political control: land reform struggles of the past and present in Ecuador," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66383, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Frances Stewart, 2009. "Relaxing the shackles: The invisible pendulum," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(6), pages 765-771.
    5. Putzel, James, 2002. "Politics, the state and the impulse for social protection : the implications of Karl Polanyi's ideas for understanding development and crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah Stokes-Ramos, 2023. "Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1970-1988, November.
    2. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    3. Christian Berndt & Marion Werner & Víctor Ramiro Fernández, 2020. "Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 216-236, February.
    4. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Goodwin, Geoff, 2021. "Fictitious commodification and agrarian change: indigenous peoples and land markets in Highland Ecuador," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. David Mosse & Sundara Babu Nagappan, 2021. "NGOs as Social Movements: Policy Narratives, Networks and the Performance of Dalit Rights in South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 134-167, January.
    7. Quintin Bradley, 2022. "The accountancy of marketisation: Fictional markets in housing land supply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 493-507, May.
    8. Richard Sandbrook, 2022. "Polanyi's Double Movement and Capitalism Today," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 647-675, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1268-1290, September.
    2. Goodwin, Geoff, 2022. "Double movements and disembedded economies: a response to Richard Sandbrook," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113686, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    4. R.C. Sudheesh, 2023. "State Life: Land, Welfare and Management of the Landless in Kerala, India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 870-891, July.
    5. Goodwin, Geoff, 2019. "The problem and promise of coproduction: Politics, history, and autonomy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 501-513.
    6. Kretschmer, Mark, 2019. "Karl Polanyi and economics: Polanyi's pendulum in economic science," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    7. Damien Cahill, 2020. "Market analysis beyond market fetishism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 27-45, February.
    8. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Coral, Claudia & Bokelmann, Wolfgang & Bonatti, Michelle & Carcamo, Robert & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Understanding institutional change mechanisms for land use: Lessons from Ecuador’s history," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Christopher Lloyd & Tony Ramsay, 2017. "Resisting neo-liberalism, reclaiming democracy? 21st-century organised labour beyond Polanyi and Streeck," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(1), pages 129-145, March.
    11. Unai Villalba-Eguiluz & Asier Arcos-Alonso & Juan Carlos Pérez de Mendiguren & Leticia Urretabizkaia, 2020. "Social and Solidarity Economy in Ecuador: Fostering an Alternative Development Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Goodwin, Geoff, 2021. "Fictitious commodification and agrarian change: indigenous peoples and land markets in Highland Ecuador," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    double movement; fictitious commodities; commodification; decommodification; countermovement; embeddedness; Karl Polayi;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:87253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.