IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/79910.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Use of multicriteria decision analysis for assessing the benefit and risk of over-the-counter analgesics

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, Andrew
  • Crossley, Anne
  • Ng, Bernard
  • Phillips, Lawrence D.
  • Sancak, Özgür
  • Rainsford, K.D.

Abstract

Objectives : To test the ability of a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model to incorporate disparate data sources of varying quality along with clinical judgement in a benefit-risk assessment of six well-known pain-relief drugs. Methods: Six OTC analgesics were evaluated against three favourable effects and eight unfavourable effects by seven experts who specialise in the relief of pain, two in a two-day facilitated workshop whose input data and judgements were later peer-reviewed by five additional experts. Key findings: Ibuprofen salts & solubilised emerged with the best benefit-risk profile, followed by naproxen, ibuprofen acid, diclofenac, paracetamol, and aspirin. Conclusions: MCDA enabled participants to evaluate the OTC analgesics against a range of favourable and unfavourable effects in a group setting that enabled all issues to be openly aired and debated. The model was easily communicated and understood by the peer reviewers, so the model should be comprehensible to physicians, pharmacists, and other health professionals

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, Andrew & Crossley, Anne & Ng, Bernard & Phillips, Lawrence D. & Sancak, Özgür & Rainsford, K.D., 2017. "Use of multicriteria decision analysis for assessing the benefit and risk of over-the-counter analgesics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 79910, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:79910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/79910/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mónica D. Oliveira & Inês Mataloto & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 891-918, August.
    2. Zhang, Hong & Akuamoah, Saviour Worlanyo & Georgescu, Paul, 2020. "A flow model of corporate activities with quality assurance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    OTC analgesics; MCDA; group judgements; decision conferencing; pain relief;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:79910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.