IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/64068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Currency School versus Banking School: an ongoing confrontation

Author

Listed:
  • Goodhart, Charles
  • Jensen, Meinhard

Abstract

The Chicago Plan and Laina’s full-reserve banking proposal are themselves extensions of Ricardo’s earlier proposal for separating money creation from bank intermediation, as incorporated in the 1844 Bank Act. This was the key Currency School position, which was opposed then and subsequently by the Banking School. In this Commentary we outline the criticisms which Banking School supporters have made over the centuries of the Currency School, and indicate what alternative principles the Banking School has proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodhart, Charles & Jensen, Meinhard, 2015. "Currency School versus Banking School: an ongoing confrontation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64068, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:64068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64068/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Toporowski, 2005. "Theories of Financial Disturbance," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3179.
    2. Basil J. Moore, 1981. "Is the Money Stock Really a Control Variable?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 43-46, July.
    3. Arnon,Arie, 2011. "Monetary Theory and Policy from Hume and Smith to Wicksell," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521191135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klapkiv Lyubov & Ulgen Faruk, 2022. "An Evolutionary Perspective on the Endogenous Instability of Capitalist Dynamics," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 9(56), pages 291-308, January.
    2. Jan Marc Berk & Jan Willem van den End, 2022. "Excess Liquidity and the Usefulness of the Money Multiplier," Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 55(4), pages 457-488.
    3. Harris Dellas & George S. Tavlas, 2022. "Retrospectives: On the Evolution of the Rules versus Discretion Debate in Monetary Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 245-260, Summer.
    4. Xuan Wang, 2019. "When Do Currency Unions Benefit From Default ?," 2019 Papers pwa938, Job Market Papers.
    5. Peter Dietsch, 2021. "Money creation, debt, and justice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 151-179, May.
    6. Xuan Wang, 2021. "Bankruptcy Codes and Risk Sharing of Currency Unions," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-009/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 357-387, March.
    8. Dellas, Harris & Tavlas, George, 2021. "On the Evolution of the Rules versus Discretion Debate," CEPR Discussion Papers 15976, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles A. E. Goodhart & Meinhard A. Jensen, 2015. "A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà's 'Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Jan Toporowski, 2016. "Microfoundations, Minsky and Classical Political Economy," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 92-98, January.
    3. Nicola Acocella-super-, 2017. "The Rise And Decline Of Economic Policy As An Autonomous Discipline: A Critical Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 661-677, July.
    4. Piotr Żuk & Paweł Żuk, 2018. "Offshoring, labour migration and neo-liberalisation: nationalist responses and alternatives in Eastern Europe," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(1), pages 97-117, March.
    5. Sissoko, Carolyn & Ishizu, Mina, 2021. "How the West India trade fostered last resort lending by the Bank of England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108565, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Noemi Levy-Orlik, 2012. "Financial Market Organizations, Central Banks and Credits: The Experience of Developing Economies," Chapters, in: Louis-Philippe Rochon & Salewa ‘Yinka Olawoye (ed.), Monetary Policy and Central Banking, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Dirk Bezemer, 2012. "Credit cycles," Chapters, in: Jan Toporowski & Jo Michell (ed.), Handbook of Critical Issues in Finance, chapter 10, pages i-ii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Ghislain Deleplace, 2020. "An Unorthodox Genealogy on the Relation between the Markets for Currency Exchange and Credit in Steuart, Thornton, Tooke, and Keynes (1923)," Post-Print hal-04253401, HAL.
    9. Michele Bee & Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi, 2024. "Agreement is money: Beyond the chartalist reading of Adam Smith," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 666, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    10. Robert W. Dimand, 2013. "David Hume and Irving Fisher on the quantity theory of money in the long run and the short run," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 284-304, April.
    11. Ömer Tuğsal DORUK & Yusuf Can ŞAHİNTÜRK, 2019. "Minskian Financial Instability Hypothesis and Its Post Keynesian Roots: A Theoretical Approach," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society.
    12. Laurent Le Maux, 2021. "Bagehot for Central Bankers," Working Papers Series inetwp147, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    13. Ciccone, Michele, 2022. "Some notes on Ricardo's analysis of the convergence process of the market rate of interest to the natural rate," MPRA Paper 112887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bill Lucarelli, 2011. "The Economics of Financial Turbulence," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14252.
    15. Mauricio C. Coutinho, 2014. "Arguments On Nom-Metallic Money (1650-1750)," Anais do XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 41st Brazilian Economics Meeting] 006, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    16. Ghislain Deleplace, 2021. "“La crédibilité d’une monnaie à étalon métallique chez Law, Steuart, Thonton, Ricardo”," Post-Print hal-04429170, HAL.
    17. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
    18. Jérôme de Boyer des Roches, 2013. "Bank liquidity risk: From John Law (1705) to Walter Bagehot (1873)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 547-571, August.
    19. Marion Dieudonné, 2016. "Credit, Shares And Goodwill: A Veblenian Trinity," Working Papers hal-01264730, HAL.
    20. Angelo Reati & Jan Toporowski, 2009. "An economic policy for the fifth long wave," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 62(248-251), pages 143-186.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Currency School and Banking School; rules vs discretion; money vs quasi-money; evolutionary vs static banking structure.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:64068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.