IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/115909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Skills and training in hierarchical capitalism: the rise and fall of vocational training in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Fleckenstein, Timo
  • Lee, Soohyun Christine
  • Park, Jae Hyoung

Abstract

From an economic model in which education and growth reinforced each other, South Korea has developed a pathological equilibrium holding back economic and social progress. Low labour productivity and skills mismatch undermine the economic prospects of the country, and sharp rises in inequality in an ever more dualised labour market erode social cohesion. Governments of different political persuasion have recognised these challenges, and they have thought to reinvigorate vocational education and training (VET). However, this article shows that large employers – which were at the heart of a segmentalist coalition between business and government when collective skills formation of the Developmental State was dismantled – continue to undermine any efforts of meaningful vocational skills formation. It is argued that the country’s hierarchical production regime and, related to this, labour market dualisation provide the micro-foundations for successive failure in VET reform; and without challenging large employers’ dominant position in the Korean political economy and without addressing labour market dualism, the reform of VET policy can be expected to remain a futile endeavour.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine & Park, Jae Hyoung, 2023. "Skills and training in hierarchical capitalism: the rise and fall of vocational training in South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115909, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/115909/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Emmenegger & Lina Seitzl, 2019. "Collective Action, Business Cleavages and the Politics of Control: Segmentalism in the Swiss Skill Formation System," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 576-598, September.
    2. Marius R. Busemeyer, 2012. "Business as a Pivotal Actor in the Politics of Training Reform: Insights from the Case of Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 690-713, December.
    3. Jong-Wha Lee, 2016. "The Republic of Korea’s Economic Growth and Catch-Up: Implications for the People’s Republic of China," Working Papers id:10770, eSocialSciences.
    4. Ringen, Stein & Kwon, Huck-ju & Yi, Ilcheong & Kim, Taekyoon & Lee, Jooha, 2011. "The Korean State and Social Policy: How South Korea Lifted Itself from Poverty and Dictatorship to Affluence and Democracy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199734351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius R Busemeyer & Martin B Carstensen & Patrick Emmenegger, 2022. "Orchestrators of coordination: Towards a new role of the state in coordinated capitalism?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(2), pages 231-250, June.
    2. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2019. "The political economy of education and skills in South Korea: democratisation, liberalisation and education reform in comparative perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87607, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2017. "The politics of labor market reform in coordinated welfare capitalism: comparing Sweden, Germany, and South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Niccolo Durazzi, 2023. "Engineering the expansion of higher education: High skills, advanced manufacturing, and the knowledge economy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 121-141, January.
    5. Benassi, Chiara & Durazzi, Niccolo & Fortwengel, Johann, 2020. "Not all firms are created equal: SMEs and vocational training in the UK, Italy, and Germany," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Chiara Benassi & Niccolo Durazzi & Johann Fortwengel, 2022. "Comparative institutional disadvantage: Small firms and vocational training in the British manufacturing sector in comparative perspective," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 371-390, June.
    7. Hyun Kyoung Kim, 2017. "From a dualized labor market to a dualized welfare state: Employment insecurity and welfare state development in South Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 76-93, March.
    8. Alexandra Strebel & Patrick Emmenegger & Lukas Graf, 2021. "New Interest Associations in a Neo‐Corporatist System: Adapting the Swiss Training System to the Service Economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 848-873, September.
    9. Mohammed Ahmad S. Al-Shamsi, 2022. "Review of Korean Imitation and Innovation in the Last 60 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Olga A. Shvetsova & Sang-Kon Lee, 2021. "Living Labs in University-Industry Cooperation as a Part of Innovation Ecosystem: Case Study of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2017. "Democratization, post-industrialization, and East Asian welfare capitalism: the politics of welfare state reform in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69574, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Huck-ju Kwon & Eunju Kim, 2014. "Poverty Reduction and Good Governance: Examining the Rationale of the Millennium Development Goals," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(2), pages 353-375, March.
    13. Xavier St‐Denis & Matissa Hollister, 2023. "Two paths towards job instability: Comparing changes in the distribution of job tenure duration in the United Kingdom and Germany, 1984–2014," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 723-751, September.
    14. Vera Šćepanović & Antonio Martín Artiles, 2020. "Dual training in Europe: a policy fad or a policy turn?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(1), pages 15-26, February.
    15. Anthony P. D'Costa, 2018. "Capitalist maturity and South Korea's post†development conundrum," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 279-297, May.
    16. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2019. "Roads and barriers towards social investments: comparing labour market and family policy reforms in Europe and East Asia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103001, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Sang Hun Lim, 2021. "Welfare state and the social economy in compressed development: Self‐sufficiency organizations in South Korea," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(5), pages 267-278, December.
    18. Kyoung Min Kim & Dohyun Kim & Un Sun Chung, 2020. "Investigation of the Trend in Adolescent Mental Health and its Related Social Factors: A Multi-Year Cross-Sectional Study For 13 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Shahid Yusuf, 2018. "East Asian Cat or African Cat: Which One Is the Better Mouse Catcher?," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 10(1-3), pages 60-72, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Support for Policy-Oriented Research programme; T&F deal;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.