IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eep/tpaper/tp201003t2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceptions of Best Management Practices on Thai Citrus Farms and the Development of an Agri-Environmental Policy: A Case Study in the Ping River Basin, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Wimolpat Bumbudsanpharoke

    (Scottish Agricultural College, University of Edinburgh)

Abstract

The Ping river basin, one of the major tributaries in northern Thailand, is strategically interlinked with major waterways livening agricultural activities for centuries. The basin is considerably recognised as an area to be protected from potential water-consumption threats impacting downstream's agricultural and industrial activities and residential areas. Over decades, economic expansion has changed the pattern of land use putting pressures on natural resources. One of the main concerns in the Ping river basin is a deterioration of water quality. Emissions from point sources, exemplified by large industrial facilities and communities, are regulated under command and control strategies. However, diffuse discharges from agricultural activities pose pervasive difficulties in management and policy design. The recent government report highlights citrus cultivation as the activity with a high application rate of chemicals, coupled with forest encroachment. Recognition of the significant of nonpoint source pollution problems has stimulated policy makers to promote Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control farm emissions at the watershed level. A number of agricultural economics studies have made policy recommendation based on an assumption that farmers are homogenous and make decision to maximise their well-being. However, there is a lack of research around behavioural responses to agri-environmental policy. As such, this study is tailored to employ contemporary interests of economic and behavioural principles in order to tackle the problem by understanding farmers' perspective and serving correct requirements rather than traditionally campaigning policies without sound agreements. The main objective of this study is to consider psychological perspectives on farmer decision making in relation to BMP adoption. The study attempts to investigate beliefs that are associated with decision making, to understand subjectivity in conservation behaviour, to assess costs of various BMP, and to make relevant policy recommendations. Prior to the main analysis, a set of BMPs is defined. Twelve BMPs suitable for implementation in the Ping river basin are selected based on expert judgement. Two psychological theories, the Theory of Planned Behaviour and QMethodology, are proposed to investigate farmers' behavioural intentions and latent perceptions, respectively. Further, the economic analysis of BMP cost at farm level is conducted to investigate cost effects and adoption intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Wimolpat Bumbudsanpharoke, 2010. "Perceptions of Best Management Practices on Thai Citrus Farms and the Development of an Agri-Environmental Policy: A Case Study in the Ping River Basin, Thailand," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper tp201003t2, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Mar 2010.
  • Handle: RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp201003t2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eepsea.org/pub/tr/2010_Bumbudsanpharoke.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2010
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    citrus farm; agri-environmental policy; Thailand;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp201003t2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Arief Anshory yusuf (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eepsesg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.