This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Team Size and Geographic Dispersion in Scientific Research:

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
James Adams
Grant Black

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Team size in scientific research and its geographic dispersion are important because research collaboration indicates the division of labor, and because collaboration is one channel of by which knowledge spills over. For both reasons, economic efficiency of the knowledge-creating industries is intertwined with team size. This paper examines cross sectional patterns and time trends in the size of scientific teams, in collaboration between scientific institutions, and in the internationalization of research over the period 1981-1999. The data consist of 2.4 million scientific papers, or team-piecework observations, that cover the 110 top universities in the United States during 1981-1999. The number of authors per paper is our measure of team size. We find that size of scientific teams increases by 50% over the sample period. An unusually large proportion of the increase takes place since 1990, when the Internet underwent rapid commercial expansion. More striking still is the evidence on geographic dispersion of teams. Three explanations likely account for the rising institutional collaboration and internationalization of science: a) an increasing range of complementary skills is required to do cutting-edge research; b) the costs of team coordination at a distance have decreased; and c) the expansion of research outside the U.S. has made international collaboration more attractive. Given the speed of the adjustment, though, we conclude that declining cost and expansion of research elsewhere are the most likely explanations for growth in institutional collaboration, including abroad.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 466.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:466

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: teams; scientists;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create your own reading lists on IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.