Are Good Workers Employed by Good Firms? A Simple Test of Positive Assortative Matching Models
AbstractIn this article, we test a simple version of Becker's (1973) marriage model for wage setting. This model predicts positive assortative matching. We estimate this model using linked employer--employee data for the France and the United States. We reject the simple version for both countries. The zero or negative correlation between person and firm effects is not explained by estimation biases due to a lack of mobility in the data. Several other potential explanations are proposed, including Shimer (2001) style coordination friction models. We focus on direct evidence that good workers are employed by good firms. This provides a direct empirical test of the simplest version of the Becker matching model. We start by constructing a very simple structural model of production and pay that implies positive assortative matching between a worker and her employer, exactly in the spirit of Becker. We do structural estimation using both French and American matched longitudinal employer-employee data. Because the structural model implies that the log-wage of workers is the sum of a person-specific effect and a firm-specific effect, recently developed techniques (Abowd, Creecy and Kramarz 2002) can be used to estimate its parameters. Because the Becker model predicts positive assortative matching, the person and firm effects should be positively correlated. We examine this correlation and find that it is either negligibly positive (United States) or negative (France). The article discusses one possible interpretation -- biases in the estimated parameters because the mobility process that helps identify the structural parameters is not active enough. Even though this interpretation contains a grain of truth, the bias-corrected correlations are still, respectively, negligibly positive and negative. Therefore, these results must be taken at their face value. The remainder of the article tries to understand the implications of the rejection of this model. In particular, it discusses various hypotheses that are used in order to derive and estimate the structural model. First, a true and meaningful firm effect must exist. Second, the log-wage must be the sum of a person component and of a firm component. The first hypothesis that is needed in order to generate a true and meaningful firm effect is the absence of a perfectly competitive labor market. The second hypothesis -- the absence of comparative advantage in the economy -- comes from the structure of the compensation in the model: the log-wage is the sum of a person component and of a firm component.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 385.
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
Sorting; assortative matching; linked employer--employee data;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Woodcock Simon D, 2010.
"Heterogeneity and Learning in Labor Markets,"
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy,
De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-69, September.
- Marcel Fafchamps & Mans Söderbom & Najy Benhassine, 2009.
"Wage Gaps and Job Sorting in African Manufacturing,"
Journal of African Economies,
Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 18(5), pages 824-868, November.
- Benhassine, Najy & Fafchamps, Marcel & Söderbom, Måns, 2006. "Wage Gaps and Job Sorting in African Manufacturing," CEPR Discussion Papers 6003, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Pieter A. Gautier & Coen N. Teulings, 2003. "How Large are Search Frictions?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-026/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 22 Aug 2005.
- Gautier, Pieter A & Teulings, Coen N, 2005.
"How Large are Search Frictions?,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
5229, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mion, Giordano & Naticchioni, Paolo, 2007.
"The spatial sorting and matching of skills and firms,"
1721, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Giordano Mion & Paolo Naticchioni, 2009. "The spatial sorting and matching of skills and firms," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 28-55, February.
- MION, Giordano & NATICCHIONI, Paolo, 2006. "The spatial sorting and matching of skills and firms," CORE Discussion Papers 2006099, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- repec:ese:iserwp:2009-12 is not listed on IDEAS
- Martins, Pedro S., 2008.
"Dispersion in wage premiums and firm performance,"
Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 63-65, October.
- Miles Finney, 2006. "An Empirical Test of Urban Labor Matching," ERSA conference papers ersa06p372, European Regional Science Association.
- Kramarz, Francis & Machin, Stephen & Ouazad, Amine, 2008.
"What Makes a Test Score? The Respective Contributions of Pupils, Schools, and Peers in Achievement in English Primary Education,"
IZA Discussion Papers
3866, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Francis Kramarz & Stephen Machin & Amine Ouazad, 2009. "What Makes a Test Score? The Respective Contributions of Pupils, Schools and Peers in Achievement in English Primary Education," CEE Discussion Papers 0102, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
- Francis Kramarz & Stephen Machin & Amine Ouazad, 2008. "What Makes a Test Score ? The Respective Contributions of Pupils, Schools and Peers in Achievement in English Primary Education," Working Papers 2008-21, Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.
- René Böheim & Gerard Thomas Horvath & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer, 2010.
"Great Expectations: Past Wages and Unemployment Durations,"
Economics working papers
2010-09, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
- Böheim, Renè & Horvath, Gerard Thomas & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2011. "Great expectations: Past wages and unemployment durations," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 778-785.
- René Böheim & Gerard Thomas Horvath & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer, 2010. "Great Expectations: Past Wages and Unemployment Durations," NRN working papers 2010-07, The Austrian Center for Labor Economics and the Analysis of the Welfare State, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
- Böheim, René & Horvath, Gerard Thomas & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2010. "Great Expectations: Past Wages and Unemployment Durations," CEPR Discussion Papers 7974, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Andrews, Martyn J. & Gill, Len & Schank, Thorsten & Upward, Richard, 2006.
"High wage workers and low wage firms : negative assortative matching or statistical artefact?,"
42, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
- M. Andrews & L. Gill & R. Upward, 2006. "High wage workers and low wage firms: Negative assortative matching or statistical artefact?," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0615, Economics, The University of Manchester.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.