This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Horizontal Versus Vertical Tax Competition: An Empirical Test

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mario Jametti
Marius Brülhart

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In a federation, where different levels of government tax the same base, one can observe two types of externalities: a horizontal externality, working among jurisdictions of the same hierarchical level and leading to tax rates that are suboptimally low; and a vertical externality, working between different hierarchical levels of government and leading to suboptimally high tax rates. By parameterising a model of taxation in a federation that incorporates those two forces (Keen and Kotsogiannis, AER, 2002), we develop an empirically implementable discriminating hypothesis to distinguish horizontal from vertical tax-setting externalities. In essence, the test predicts that increasing jurisdictional fragmentation of a federation lowers the average tax rate of the lower-level jurisdiction if horizontal externalities dominate, but raises their average tax rate if vertical externalities dominate. This test is applied to a new and original data set on Swiss municipal and cantonal taxes, exploiting Switzerland's uniquely decentralised three-tier hierarchical structure of tax-raising powers. The main attraction of this data set is that it allows comparisons across federations (i.e. cantons) as well as within federations (over time), while existing studies of vertical tax externalities had to rely on pure time-series data. Using panel data models with instrumental variables to account for the potential endogeneity of the tax rates applied by higher-level jurisdictions, we estimate the theory-based discriminatory relationship between municipal tax rates and the jurisdictional fragmentation of cantons. This is done separately for corporate and personal tax rates applying to different representative types of tax payers. We find evidence of both vertical and horizontal externalities, depending on the type of tax and tax payer

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 303.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:303

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: tax competition; fiscal federalism; Swiss tax system; panel data models;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over 1000 institutions contribute their bibliographic data directly to this service.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.