IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/3de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knappheit sicherer Anleihen?: Neue Herausforderungen nach der Krise

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Große Steffen

Abstract

Sichere und liquide Wertpapiere sind das Schmiermittel im Finanzsystem. Sie dienen der Wertaufbewahrung, um regulatorische Erfordernisse zu erfüllen, sowie als Bezugspunkt für wichtige Marktpreise. Während einige Wissenschaftler eine fortdauernde Knappheit im Angebot sicherer Anleihen und Anlagemöglichkeiten sehen, mit möglichen globalen Auswirkungen, sind andere Wissenschaftler gelassen oder widersprechen der Ansicht einer Knappheit sicherer Anleihen. Im veränderten Umfeld nach der globalen Finanzmarktkrise und der Schuldenkrise im Euroraum stellt die Knappheit sicherer Wertpapiere neue Herausforderungen an die Wirtschaftspolitik. Während sie nach wie vor als mögliche Ursache für globale Ungleichgewichte gelten, geht die Debatte nach der Krise weit darüber hinaus in den Bereich der Finanzmarktregulierung sowie der Effektivität von Finanz- und Geldpolitik.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Große Steffen, 2014. "Knappheit sicherer Anleihen?: Neue Herausforderungen nach der Krise," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 3, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:3de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.434488.de/DIW_Roundup_3_de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Feldstein, 2013. "An Interview with Paul Volcker," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(4), pages 105-120, Fall.
    2. Ingo Fender & Ulf Lewrick, 2013. "Mind the gap? Sources and implications of supply-demand imbalances in collateral asset markets," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    3. Mr. Manmohan Singh, 2013. "The Changing Collateral Space," IMF Working Papers 2013/025, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vilma Dingova & Vaclav Hausenblas & Zlatuse Komarkova, 2014. "Collateralization and Financial Stability," Occasional Publications - Chapters in Edited Volumes, in: CNB Financial Stability Report 2013/2014, chapter 0, pages 137-147, Czech National Bank.
    2. Christoph Große Steffen, 2014. "The Safe Asset Controversy: Policy Implications after the Crisis," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 3, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Thiemann, Matthias & Birk, Marius, 2015. "The regulation of repo markets: Incorporating public interest through a stronger role of civil society," SAFE White Paper Series 25, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    4. Piero Gottardi & Vincent Maurin & Cyril Monnet, 2023. "Fragility of Secured Credit Chains," Diskussionsschriften dp2304, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    5. Nyborg, Kjell G., 2017. "Central bank collateral frameworks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 198-214.
    6. Ronald W.Anderson & Karin Jõeveer, 2014. "The Economics of Collateral," FMG Discussion Papers dp732, Financial Markets Group.
    7. Anne-Marie Rieu-Foucault, 2017. "Point sur la fourniture de liquidié publique," EconomiX Working Papers 2017-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    8. Elena Seghezza, 2018. "Can swap line arrangements help solve the Triffin dilemma? How?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 2691-2708, October.
    9. Nyborg, Kjell G., 2017. "Reprint of: Central bank collateral frameworks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 232-248.
    10. Jakob Eberl & Christopher Weber, 2014. "ECB Collateral Criteria: A Narrative Database 2001–2013," ifo Working Paper Series 174, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    11. Gary Gorton & Toomas Laarits & Tyler Muir, 2022. "Mobile Collateral versus Immobile Collateral," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 54(6), pages 1673-1703, September.
    12. Kevin L. Kliesen & David C. Wheelock, 2021. "Managing a New Policy Framework: Paul Volcker, the St. Louis Fed, and the 1979-82 War on Inflation," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 103(1), pages 71-97, January.
    13. Kumhof, Michael & Sokol, Andrej & Rungcharoenkitkul, Phurichai, 2020. "How Does International Capital Flow?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15526, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Rocheteau, Guillaume & Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio, 2014. "Liquidity provision, interest rates, and unemployment," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 80-101.
    15. Michael D. Bordo & Robert N. McCauley, 2019. "Triffin: Dilemma or Myth?," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 67(4), pages 824-851, December.
    16. Anureet Virk Sidhu & Shailesh Rastogi & Rajani Gupte & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu, 2022. "Impact of Liquidity Coverage Ratio on Performance of Select Indian Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Adrian, Tobias & Breuer, Peter & Ashcraft, Adam & Cetorelli, Nicola, 2018. "A Review of Shadow Banking," CEPR Discussion Papers 13363, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Michael D. Bordo & Robert N. McCauley, 2016. "The Current Account Version of the Triffin Dilemma," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 44(2), pages 171-182, June.
    19. Fuhrer, Lucas Marc & Müller, Benjamin & Steiner, Luzian, 2017. "The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and security prices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 292-311.
    20. A. Mantovi & G. Tagliavini, 2017. "Liquidity cognition and limits of arbitrage," Economics Department Working Papers 2017-EP01, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:3de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.