IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csa/wpaper/1997-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dualistic sector choice and female labour supply: evidence from formal and informal sector in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Gauthier Lanot
  • Christophe Muller

Abstract

In developing countries, labour supply and activity choices are distorted by the existence of labour market imperfections restricting entry to the activity sectors or rationing the worked hours. The presence of decreasing returns to labour in the informal sector is another specific characteristic of labour market dualism in LDCs. Because of the existence of entry costs, hours rationing in the formal sector and the non-linear earnings function in the informal sector that is quasi-autarkic in labour, the usual separation theorems of the standard labour supply models do not apply. Using data from a sample of women in Yaoundé (Cameroon) in 1993, choosing their activity in different sectors, we show that formal and informal labour markets have features associated with dualism and market imperfections. By contrast with the simplified models in the literature, we estimate a non-linear non-separable integrated model of activity choice and labour supply of female workers, jointly with market imperfections. We identify the effects of explanatory variables of the preferences and the earnings functions in this simultaneous structural framework. The results show that the earnings function in the informal sector is strictly concave in hours, and positively related to the education and experience of workers and the capital of the family firm. The presence of young children has a negative impact on the latent labour supply whereas that of other female members makes easier the supply of labour which is consistent with the existence of substitutabilities in the domestic chores. Other children, age and marital status of the worker also influence the latent labour supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauthier Lanot & Christophe Muller, 1997. "Dualistic sector choice and female labour supply: evidence from formal and informal sector in Cameroon," CSAE Working Paper Series 1997-09, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1997-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cf8840fa-6aa5-4a91-b56b-5b790feb8040
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. Boccanfuso & L. Savard, 2012. "A Segmented Labour Supply Model Estimation for the Construction of a CGE Microsimulation Model: An Application to the Philippines," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 6(2), pages 211-234, May.
    2. Zamo-Akono, C. & Tsafack-Nanfosso, R., 2008. "Fécondité, Santé et Participation des femmes au Marché du Travail," MPRA Paper 10839, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sayantani Roy Choudhury, 2013. "Push and Pull Factors behind Female Labor-force Participation Decision, a Study of Kerala and West Bengal: two States of India," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 74-83.
    4. Justin van der Sluis & Mirjam van Praag & Wim Vijverberg, 2003. "Entrepreneurship Selection and Performance," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-046/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 24 Sep 2004.
    5. Wambui R. Wamuthenya, 2010. "Determinants of Employment in the Formal and Informal Sectors of the Urban Areas of Kenya," Working Papers 194, African Economic Research Consortium, Research Department.
    6. Francis Teal & Rosemary Atieno, 2006. "Gender, Education and Occupational Outcomes: Kenya`s Informal Sector in the 1990s," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-050, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    7. Christian Zamo-Akono & Roger Tsafack Nanfosso, 2013. "Private Returns to Education in Urban Cameroon," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 23-37, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1997-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julia Coffey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.