IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2020-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Will Imports and Robots Push Older Workers into Nontraditional Jobs?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew S. Rutledge
  • Gal Wettstein
  • Sara Ellen King

Abstract

Recent research has called attention to workers in nontraditional jobs Ð defined here as jobs without retirement and health benefits, particularly those with volatility in hours or wages. At the same time, U.S. workers are facing growing competition from trade and automation. The question is: are trade and automation pushing more workers into nontraditional jobs? This issue may be a particular concern for older workers, who increasingly need longer careers with continued access to retirement plans and health coverage to secure an adequate retirement. To explore the relationship between trade, automation, and nontraditional work, this brief, based on a recent study, tests whether workers are more likely to be in nontraditional jobs, or to transition to such jobs, in states that have greater exposure to trade and automation. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section defines nontraditional work and presents trends in trade and automation. The second section describes the analytic approach. The third section reports the results, which show no evidence that a rise in import competition leads workers to end up in Ð or switch to Ð nontraditional jobs. However, some evidence suggests that automation does have an effect, particularly for older workers relative to mid-career workers. The final section concludes that as automation continues to increase, nontraditional jobs may grow more common, underscoring the need for alternative sources of retirement saving and health insurance coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew S. Rutledge & Gal Wettstein & Sara Ellen King, 2020. "Will Imports and Robots Push Older Workers into Nontraditional Jobs?," Issues in Brief 2020-6, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2020-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/will-imports-and-robots-push-older-workers-into-nontraditional-jobs/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Battisti, Michele & Gravina, Antonio Francesco, 2021. "Do robots complement or substitute for older workers?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2020-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.