IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2013-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Security and the 2001 Reform of the Railroad Retirement Program

Author

Listed:
  • Steven A. Sass

Abstract

The experience of the reformed Railroad Retirement program has lessons for initiatives that would invest Social Security assets in equities: * To address the risk in equity investment, Congress would likely require an automatic adjustment mechanism to keep the program “on track.” * The adjustment mechanism should address surpluses as well as shortfalls, and cannot be expected to provide a complete solution to the problem of risk. * Such a mechanism presupposes a program in balance, or moving toward balance. The investment of Social Security assets in equities would need to be part of a package that produced a sustainable Social Security program. * The adjustment mechanism would respond to any shock, not just financial shocks. Had such a mechanism always been in place, it would have introduced adjustments to the Social Security program, without the need for Congress to act, in response to the demographic shocks that created the program’s current long-term funding shortfall.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven A. Sass, 2013. "Social Security and the 2001 Reform of the Railroad Retirement Program," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2013-15, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2013-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/social-security-and-the-2001-reform-of-the-railroad-retirement-program/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2013-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.