IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crc/wpaper/1808.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Offrir des biens publics et des communs et revitaliser l’action publique dans le cadre d’un processus de « destruction créatrice »

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe BANCE

    (CRÉAM - Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, France)

Abstract

Recent developments in the economic analysis about public goods and commons, initiated notably in relation to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and to the work of Elinor Ostrom, have highlighted the social utility of their production to meet societal expectations of democracy and of sustainable development. The production of public and social economy organisations is in this perspective of crucial importance for the future, as is the outline of public policies that help develop coproduction or joint production of public goods and services. Thus, Public and Social and Solidarity Economy Partnerships (PSSEP) are the subject of analyzes in the CIRIEC book Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action that highlights: the importance of these partnerships within the framework of the current paradigm of public action; the induced behavioral transformations of the organizations; the scope that these new forms of partnership can have in terms of co-construction of public action and of responses to expectations on the territories; and the place of these partnerships in a process called here "creative destruction of public action".

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe BANCE, 2018. "Offrir des biens publics et des communs et revitaliser l’action publique dans le cadre d’un processus de « destruction créatrice »," CIRIEC Working Papers 1808, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  • Handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:1808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ciriec.uliege.be/repec/WP18-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Bance & Angelique Chassy, 2017. "The Rollout of the Multilevel Governance System: A Source of Reworking the Contingent Valuation Method?," Post-Print halshs-01965114, HAL.
    2. Frédéric Marty, 2017. "Partenariats Public-Privé," Post-Print halshs-01614875, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matei, Ani, 2007. "Les transferts de competences vus depuis la Roumanie [Competence Transfers in Romanian View]," MPRA Paper 21147, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Feb 2010.
    2. Philippe Bance & Malika Ahmed Zaïd-Chertouk & Juan Fernando Álvarez & Cristina Barna & Pierre Bauby & Manuel Belo Moreira & Jean-Claude Boual & Monique Combes-Joret & Pascal Glemain & Miguel Gordo & A, 2018. "Providing Public Goods and Commons. Towards Coproduction and New Forms of Governance for a Revival of Public Action [Offrir des biens publics et des communs. Vers la coproduction et de nouvelles fo," Post-Print halshs-01964961, HAL.
    3. Philippe Batifoulier & Denis Abecassis & Nicolas da Silva & Victor Duchesne & Léonard Moulin, 2016. "L’utilité sociale de la dépense publique," Working Papers hal-01421197, HAL.
    4. Elhadji Mounirou Ndiaye, 2018. "Public/Private Partnership and tariff regulation failure: the example of Dakar/Diamniadio toll highway in Senegal," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 393-403.
    5. Philippe BANCE, 2018. "Conclusion. Public - Social and Solidarity Economy Partnerships (PSSEPs) and collective action paradigm," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 301-312, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    6. Sonia Guelton, 2015. "Public-private partnerships for the delivery of local public services: a powerful motivation for public finance consolidation? [La gestion des services publics locaux en partenariat public-privé: U," Post-Print hal-01715634, HAL.
    7. Irina Statsenko, 2018. "Economic Preconditions for the Development of Public-Private Partnership in the Vologda Region," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 927-940.
    8. Mande Buafua, Patrick, 2015. "Efficiency of urban water supply in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do organization and regulation matter?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 13-22.
    9. Geoffroy Theodore Aliha & Marielle Audrey Payaud, 2015. "Les facteurs de réussites et d’échec des Partenariats Public-Privé (PPP) : regard des parties prenantes publiques dans un Pays En Développement (PED)," Post-Print hal-01223653, HAL.
    10. Philippe Bance & Angélique Chassy, 2020. "Citizen Advisory Committees in the Contingent Valuation Method Process," Post-Print hal-02910722, HAL.
    11. Philippe BANCE (ed.), 2018. "Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 1, number css1.
    12. Riazanova Nataliia, 2019. "Research of the interaction of public-private partnership as a tool of development of alternative energy," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(46) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(46)), pages 52-54.
    13. Hubert Amarillo & Martine Gadille, 2009. "L'enjeu des qualifications face au défi énergétique et environnemental dans la construction," Working Papers halshs-00455378, HAL.
    14. Nicolas Dupas & Frédéric Marty & Arnaud Voisin, 2011. "Partnership contracts, project finance and information asymmetries: from competition for the contract to competition within the contract?," Post-Print halshs-00202327, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public goods; commons; coproduction; joint production; public action; paradigm; destructive creation; social economy organisations; public organisations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out
    • L38 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Policy
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:1808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CIRIEC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciulgbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.