IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/17798.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender differences in effects of goal-setting: Evidence from a fundraising field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Sarah
  • Wilhelm, Mark

Abstract

We report findings from an intervention that presented a randomly selected group of fundraisers with varying default goal values. There is a striking gender difference in the effect of the intervention: Male fundraisers respond to higher default values by raising more funds; female fundraisers do not. The explanation is not that there is a gender difference in default effects on the setting of goals: high default values do not have a strong countervailing (negative) effect on goal-setting for female fundraisers. Instead, there is a gender difference in the causal effect of different value goals on funds raised: Setting higher goals causes male fundraisers to raise more money, but (counterintuitively) setting low goals causes them to raise less money than no goal. By contrast, setting low goals causes female fundraisers to raise more money than no goal, but (counterintuitively) they do not raise more money if they set a high goal. Gender differences in beliefs, specifically optimism and grit, are plausible explanations for these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Sarah & Wilhelm, Mark, 2023. "Gender differences in effects of goal-setting: Evidence from a fundraising field experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 17798, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP17798
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.