IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1967.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Rajna Gibson

    (University of Geneva - Geneva Finance Research Institute (GFRI))

  • Philipp Krueger

    (University of Geneva - Geneva Finance Research Institute (GFRI); Swiss Finance Institute)

  • Nadine Riand

    (University of Geneva - Geneva Finance Research Institute)

  • Peter Steffen Schmidt

    (University of Zurich - Department of Banking and Finance; University of Geneva - Geneva Finance Research Institute (GFRI))

Abstract

Using a sample of S&P 500 firms between 2013 and 2017, we study the impact of ESG rating disagreement on stock returns. Building on the heterogeneous beliefs literature, we conjecture that for disagreement about environmental ratings, a risk–based explanation induces a positive relationship between disagreement and stock returns. In contrast, we hypothesize that for disagreement about the social and the governance dimension, the impact on stock returns is driven by mispricing considerations and also depends on whether the disagreeing rating providers are located in civil or common law jurisdictions. The idea is that civil (common) law rating providers are more apt at identifying material social (governance) information, and that disagreement by such rating providers results in overvaluation and thus lower subsequent stock returns. Our empirical findings support these hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajna Gibson & Philipp Krueger & Nadine Riand & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2019. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 19-67, Swiss Finance Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3433728
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erhart, Szilárd, 2022. "Take it with a pinch of salt—ESG rating of stocks and stock indices," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    3. Addisu A. Lashitew, 2021. "Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 184-200, March.
    4. Gao, Feng & Li, Yubin & Wang, Xinjie & Zhong, Zhaodong (Ken), 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and the term structure of CDS spreads," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Özge Sahin & Karoline Bax & Claudia Czado & Sandra Paterlini, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar—Why does missing information matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1782-1798, September.
    6. Bae, Kee-Hong & El Ghoul, Sadok & Gong, Zhaoran (Jason) & Guedhami, Omrane, 2021. "Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Gardenier, Julius & Lac, Visieu & Ashfaq, Muhammad, 2021. "Risk-adjusted return in sustainable finance: A comparative analysis of European positively screened and best-in-class ESG investment portfolios and the Euro Stoxx 50 index using the Sharpe Ratio," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 7/2021, IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    8. Lopez, Claude & Contreras, Oscar & Bendix, Joseph, 2020. "Disagreement among ESG rating agencies: shall we be worried?," MPRA Paper 103027, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.