IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1631.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Calibration of Quantum Decision Theory, Aversion to Large Losses and Predictability of Probabilistic Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Vincent

    (ETH Zurich)

  • Tatyana Kovalenko

    (ETH Zurich)

  • Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

    (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; D-MTEC, ETH Zurich)

  • Didier Sornette

    (Swiss Finance Institute; ETH Zürich - Department of Management, Technology, and Economics (D-MTEC))

Abstract

We present the first calibration of quantum decision theory (QDT) to an empirical data set. The data comprise 91 choices between two lotteries (two "prospects") presented in 91 random pairs made by 142 subjects offered at two separated times. First, we quantitatively account for the fraction of choice reversals between the two repetitions of the decisions, using a probabilistic choice formulation in the simplest possible form with no model assumption and no adjustable parameter. The prediction of choice reversal is then refined by introducing heterogeneity between decision makers through a differentiation of the population into two similar sized groups in terms of "over-confident" and "contrarian" decision makers. This supports the first fundamental tenet of QDT, which models the choice of an option as an inherent probabilistic process, such that the probability of a choice can be expressed as the sum of its utility and attraction factors. We propose to model (a) the utility factor with a stochastic version of cumulative prospect theory (logit-CPT), and (b) the attraction factor with a constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) function. This makes logit-CPT nested in our proposed parameterisation of QDT, allowing for a precise quantitative comparison between the two theories. For this data set, the QDT model is found to perform better at both the aggregate and individual levels, and for all considered fit criteria both for the first iteration of the experiment and for predictions (second iteration). The QDT effect associated with the attraction factor is mostly appreciable for prospects with big losses. Our quantitative analysis of the experiment results supports the existence of an intrinsic limit of predictability, which is associated with the inherent probabilistic nature of choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Vincent & Tatyana Kovalenko & Vyacheslav I. Yukalov & Didier Sornette, 2016. "Calibration of Quantum Decision Theory, Aversion to Large Losses and Predictability of Probabilistic Choices," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 16-31, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2775279
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferro, Giuseppe M. & Kovalenko, Tatyana & Sornette, Didier, 2021. "Quantum decision theory augments rank-dependent expected utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Maroussia Favre & Amrei Wittwer & Hans Rudolf Heinimann & Vyacheslav I Yukalov & Didier Sornette, 2016. "Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Yukalov, V.I. & Yukalova, E.P. & Sornette, D., 2022. "Role of collective information in networks of quantum operating agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quantum decision theory; QDT; prospect probability; utility factor; attraction factor; interference; parametrization; hierarchical estimation method; calibration; empirical data; simple gambles; stochastic Cumulative prospect theory; logit-CPT; probabilistic decision making; limits of predictability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.